2012
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in histologically challenging conjunctival melanocytic lesions

Abstract: FISH is very useful in classifying equivocal conjunctival melanocytic lesions, especially those with atypical junctional activity and naevoid melanocytic proliferations of the conjunctiva.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In equivocal conjunctival melanocytic lesions, FISH has been proven useful for classification, especially in cases with atypical junctional activity and naevoid melanocytic proliferations (Mudhar et al. ).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In equivocal conjunctival melanocytic lesions, FISH has been proven useful for classification, especially in cases with atypical junctional activity and naevoid melanocytic proliferations (Mudhar et al. ).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques have also been developed to assist ocular pathologists with histopathologically equivocal melanocytic lesions, such as fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) and pump probe microscopy [56,57]; however, these are beyond the scope of this review.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FISH analysis was performed for diagnostic purposes. In fact, in recent papers, the application of fluorescence in situ hybridisation has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for the diagnosis of ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms of the conjunctiva [9,10] as demonstrated in skin lesions [11,12]. Taking into account that the sensitivity of the technique is around 87%, a positive FISH result provides additional support in favor of melanoma, whereas a negative FISH result makes melanoma less likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%