2001
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.118642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence induced with 5-aminolevulinic acid for the endoscopic detection and follow-up of esophageal lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential contributing factors include recent biopsy and resulting re-epithelialization, which has been shown to contribute to false positives in another study evaluating a different fluorescent contrast agent. 48 While it is important to understand how such factors influence the VFI technique, a larger study is required to make such an assessment. Moreover, additional studies are needed to understand whether high-resolution microscopy or another secondary imaging technique would aid in reducing the number of false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential contributing factors include recent biopsy and resulting re-epithelialization, which has been shown to contribute to false positives in another study evaluating a different fluorescent contrast agent. 48 While it is important to understand how such factors influence the VFI technique, a larger study is required to make such an assessment. Moreover, additional studies are needed to understand whether high-resolution microscopy or another secondary imaging technique would aid in reducing the number of false positives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingestible agents such as 5-aminolevulinic acid have been shown to identify neoplastic lesions in vivo; 20,21 however, current research prioritizes its use with photodynamic therapy. 22,23 A variety of biomarkers have been identified to assess the presence of disease ex vivo through histologic staining; the cytosponge technique has been shown to aid in identifying those biomarkers postprocedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CT imaging is the single most widely used procedure for cancer staging, several other techniques can enhance the accuracy of staging in esophageal malignancies (Table 2) [4]. These techniques include endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) [5,6,7••,8,9••], positron emission tomography (PET) [1,10,11], optical coherence tomography (OCT) [12•], chromoscopy [13•], high-resolution/magnification endoscopy [14], endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [15], fluorescent endoscopy [16][17][18], and ultrasonic tactile sensing [19]. Some of the techniques for staging can also be used for screening in high-risk populations for esophageal cancer.…”
Section: Endoscopic Diagnosis and Staging Of Esophageal Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ainsi, Mayinger et al ont rapporté une excellente sensibilité (98 %) et spécificité (89 %) de la spectroscopie de dispersion élastique pour différencier les lésions adénomateuses et non adénomateuses colorectales [21]. Comme pour l'imagerie endoscopique par fluorescence, l'intensité et la spécificité de la fluorescence peuvent être améliorées par l'administration de fluorophores exogènes.…”
Section: Spectroscopie De Dispersion éLastiqueunclassified