The binding of indole and indolepropanol phosphate, an analogue of the substrate indoleglycerol phosphate, to the individual a and P,-subunits and to the a2 8,-cornplex of tryptophan synthase was studied by equilibrium dialysis. The use of ['4C]indole and indolepropanol [32P]phosphate permitted simultaneous binding studies to be carried out. Competition between indole and indolepropanol phosphate in binding to a particular site was taken as evidence for that site being part of the active site of the a-subunit.The binding of indole to the active site of the a-subunit is weak (Kd = 18 mM). A second distinct site binds indole more strongly (Kd = 1.5 mM) and interacts with the active site indirectly. It is therefore designated an effector site. Furthermore, the binding of indole and/or indolepropanol phosphate appears to stabilize different conformations of the a-subunit. The B,-subunit binds indole only weakly (Kd = 12 mM) to many (n = 10) sites per polypeptide chain. The a,P,-cornplex retains one or two sites per ap-equivalent of relatively high affinity (Kd = 1.2 mM). The active sites of the component a and 8-subunits probably belong to the second class of many (n = 40) sites of low (Kd = 30 mM) affinity for indole. These findings support conclusions from the literature that both bi-substrate reactions involving indole catalyzed by tryptophan synthase and its subunits must follow strictly ordered addition mechanisms with the respective other substrate adding first. +L-tryptophan + H20.
(reaction 3 )The a-subunit is capable of catalyzing reaction (2) and the P,-subunit reaction (3) albeit only 1 -2 % as efficiently as the a,P,-complex. Reactions (2) (3) can formally be considered to be partial reactions of the physiologically relevant reaction (I), which can be catalyzed only by the native a,P,-complex [I]. This hypothesis implies that indole is a free intermediate. However, no indole could be detected in various trapping experiments designed to prove its transient accumulation in the course of the reaction (1) [ 2 , 3 ] . These findings have been interpreted in terms of a channelling effect, whereby the particular organization of a hypothetical composite active site [4] precludes the equilibration of indole with the bulk solvent. However, this is not a unique explanation and more direct evidence pertaining to the relationship between the partial reactions (2) and ( 3 ) and the overall reaction (1) appears desirable. In particular, it is pertinent to ask whether the indole subsites in the active sites of the a and the P2-subunits are retained and/or modified in the a,~,-complex. Such studies would also provide ancillary evidence for interpreting steady-state kinetic data.