2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent detection and imaging of Hg 2+ using a novel phenanthroline derivative based single- and two-photon excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fluorescent maximum point appeared at the ratio of Ca 2+ /probe = 0.5, which is different from that of OP excitation. This may be attributed to the higher concentration (8 × 10 −4 mol/L) of the dye under TP excitation, and this phenomenon was found in our previous reports [18,34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, the fluorescent maximum point appeared at the ratio of Ca 2+ /probe = 0.5, which is different from that of OP excitation. This may be attributed to the higher concentration (8 × 10 −4 mol/L) of the dye under TP excitation, and this phenomenon was found in our previous reports [18,34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…S5), using the Benesi-Hildebrand analysis [38][39][40]. The association constant of DPBT-Hg 2+ was higher than most of reported Hg 2+ fluorescent probes [48][49][50][51].The association constant of DPBT-Cu 2+ was close to the values of other Cu 2+ probes reported in the literature [52][53][54]. DPBT exhibited excellent analytical performance to Hg 2+ and Cu 2+ .…”
Section: Nature Of the Complexationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Nevertheless, the addition of melamine could distinctly recover the fluorescence of CPNs curve d’ in Figure 5b. In addition, the fluorescence quantum yields ( Ф s) of CPNs in the absence and presence of AuNPs and melamine have been calculated using a solution containing coumarin 307 ( Ф = 0.56, in methanol) standard as the reference according to the equation reported [42]. The values of Ф s were listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%