2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent labels for proteomics and genomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] While this practice continues to the present day, organic dyes have more recently made significant contributions to 21st century technologies, such as fluorescence bioimaging [4] and semiconductor materials for organic electronics. Organic electronics is a closely related new technology that promises to deliver cheaper, flexible, large-scale manufactured electronic devices that rely on organic small-molecule or polymer semiconductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] While this practice continues to the present day, organic dyes have more recently made significant contributions to 21st century technologies, such as fluorescence bioimaging [4] and semiconductor materials for organic electronics. Organic electronics is a closely related new technology that promises to deliver cheaper, flexible, large-scale manufactured electronic devices that rely on organic small-molecule or polymer semiconductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial covalent modification of proteins is an arduous but fruitful task of major interest for the biophysics and biochemistry communities that normally pursue as goals the detection or purification of the protein itself in order to have a more thorough understanding of molecular mechanisms and the expansion of the applicability of such biomolecules. Despite the intrinsic difficulties associated to perform those chemical modifications of proteins, the attachment of analytical or engineered probes for protein tracking (labelling) (Giepmans et al, 2006;Waggoner, 2006;Wu & Goody, 2010) or protein profiling (chemical proteomics) (Evans & Cravatt, 2006;Cravatt et al, 2008), the introduction of affinity tags for separation-isolation of proteins (affinity chromatography) (Azarkan et al, 2007;Fang & Zhang, 2008) or for mass spectroscopy-based protein identification and characterization (chemical tagging) (Leitner & Lindner, 2006), the immobilization onto solid supports (microarray technologies) (Wong et al, 2009) and the conjugation with other biomolecules (post-translational modifications) (Gamblin et al, 2008b;Walsh, 2009;Heal & Tate, 2010) are among some of the most useful and frontier techniques and methodologies used in Proteomics. For the chemical modification of proteins, a large number of strategies are nowadays available (Hermanson, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-molecular mass BPLPs can be made to be water-insoluble or -soluble maximizing their potential applications in biological labeling and imaging. The water soluble low-molecular-weight BPLPs may potentially be used for single molecule labeling such as protein and DNA labeling in proteomics and genomics research, where quantum dots may not be ideal because of their size (7,8). The BPLP family may also be suitable for use in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) (5), 2-photon excited fluorescence microscopy (6), multimodal compositions (combined with magnetic or radionuclear agents) (31), and biosensors (32).…”
Section: Cytotoxicity Evaluation and Bioimaging Study In Vitro And Inmentioning
confidence: 99%