2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent molecularly imprinted membranes as biosensor for the detection of target protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They mentioned that the fluorescent quantum dots embedded membrane, which enables the optical readout characteristic and high selectivity within a membrane. They first optimized the experiment conditions and calculated the detection limit as 10.2 nM with a range from 1.0 × 10 −7 to 1.0 × 10 −6 M. They also calculated the recoveries of the imprinted membrane for lysozyme determination in real samples as 93–103% [108]. Göçenoğlu et al published a study about imprinted nanoparticle based SPR sensor system for uric acid recognition.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Based Sementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They mentioned that the fluorescent quantum dots embedded membrane, which enables the optical readout characteristic and high selectivity within a membrane. They first optimized the experiment conditions and calculated the detection limit as 10.2 nM with a range from 1.0 × 10 −7 to 1.0 × 10 −6 M. They also calculated the recoveries of the imprinted membrane for lysozyme determination in real samples as 93–103% [108]. Göçenoğlu et al published a study about imprinted nanoparticle based SPR sensor system for uric acid recognition.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Based Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…( a ) Synthesis of quantum dots embedded imprinted membranes and ( b ) scanning electron microscope images of paper and quantum dots based ion-imprinted polymers: (A) the bare, (B) quantum dots grafted on the glass fiber, (C) quantum dots; (D) ion-imprinted polymer; (E) ion-imprinted polymer bonded with the quantum dots; (F) ion-imprinted polymer and quantum dots bound on the glass fiber. Republished with permission from [108,110]; permission conveyed through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with organic fluorescent dye, QDs are more photostable and can exhibit strong luminescence, wide excitation but sharp emission profile, which are size-dependent (Silvi and Credi, 2015). The most well-known QDs embedded in MI-FL sensors are cadmium (Cd) (Huy et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014b) and zinc (Zn) based (Chantada-Vázquez et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017a;Li et al, 2017a;Zhang et al, 2018), and as we know, QDs synthesized using hydrophobic ligands such as trioctyl phosphine oxide (TOPO) can endow QDs with excellent quantum yield and chemical stability, but limit their hydrophilic applications. Using a reverse microemulsion polymerization, Liu et al (2014b) embedded the hydrophobic TOPO-modified CdSe QDs into the MI-FL sensor using cyclohexane as a continuous phase and Triton X-100 as a surfactant, obtaining both high quantum yield and hydrophilic applicability for ractopamine detection.…”
Section: Embedding Of Fluorescence Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those molecularly imprinted synthetic receptors have exhibited integrated properties, including high affinity, robustness, low production cost, and great specificity. As a result, they may serve as the promising candidate natural receptors [50] , [51] , [52] . Great advances have been attained in the fields of nanotechnology and polymer science, which have strengthened the performances of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%