demonstrating a lower dependence on fossil fuels. Although crystalline silicon (c-Si) is still the market front runner for PV due to its ideal bandgap for single-junction solar cells, c-Si does not have a readily tunable bandgap. This makes c-Si less suited for indoor PV or multijunction solar cells, which require alternative bandgaps to operate at their peak. In just over a decade of research, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as an alternative PV technology which have tuneable bandgaps, low fabrication costs, solution processability, compliancy with flexible materials, long electron-hole diffusion length, and high charge carrier mobility. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The perovskite absorber layer is based on the ABX 3 crystal structure made up of organic/inorganic monovalent cations (A), a divalent cation (B) and one or more halides (X) as shown in Figure 1a. [10] Since the first publication on PSCs in 2009, the power conversion efficiencies (PCE) have gone from 3.8% to 25.7 %, making PSCs the fastest growing PV technology to date. [11][12][13] Despite their promise, toxic heavy metal element Pb (in the structure's B-site) is still required to achieve highly competitive efficiencies, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] which is a major obstacle in the field that is yet to be overcome. In contact with moisture and/or light + oxygen lead halide perovskites can easily decompose into watersoluble compounds of lead, [24][25][26][27][28] which then inevitably accumulate within the food chain and therefore have the potential to ingress into the human body. [29] While several low toxicity metal halide alternatives to Pb have been proposed, [30][31][32][33][34][35] the favorable physical and optical properties of Sn make it the most promising substitute. [29,36] The first demonstration of Sn-halide PSCs was in 2014, where Hao et al. and Noel et al. reported 5.7% and 6.4% PCE respectively using methylammonium tin halides as the absorber layers (MAS-nIBr 2 and MASnI 3 , respectively). [30,31] At present, the highest performing Sn-halide PSCs show PCEs of over 14%; Yu et al. reported certified 14.03%-efficient 2D/3D perovskite solar cells, [37] while Jiang et al. achieved a certified PCE of 14.6% via a novel film fabrication route based on SnI 2 adducts (further details will be provided below). [38] To date, most of the progress with Sn-halide perovskites has been made using formamidinium tin iodide (FASnI 3 , see Figure 1b) and closely related recipes. [39][40][41][42][43] The favored use of the FA cation can be attributed to the higher formation energies of Sn vacancies in FASnI 3 and thus a lower hole density in comparison to MASnI 3 . [44] In comparison to their Pb-based counterparts, Sn-halide perovskites Substituting toxic lead with tin (Sn) in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) is the most promising route toward the development of high-efficiency lead-free devices. Despite the encouraging efficiencies of Sn-PSCs, they are still yet to surpass 15% and suffer detrimental oxidation of Sn(II) to Sn(IV). Since their...