2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10948-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoride contamination in and around selected geothermal sites in Odisha, Eastern India: assessment of ionic relations, fluoride exposure and remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of F remains a challenging task because of operational and maintenance cost, complex technology involved, and huge sludge generation that always demands cost‐effective geosorbent, which can also form in a fluoride‐polluted environment, acting as a natural sink. Ion exchange, membrane filtration, precipitation, coagulation, and biodegradation are the routinely adopted treatment techniques for F removal, which require high cost and involve complex mechanisms (Jha et al, 2013; Maitra et al, 2021; Mohapatra et al, 2009; Roy & Dass, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of F remains a challenging task because of operational and maintenance cost, complex technology involved, and huge sludge generation that always demands cost‐effective geosorbent, which can also form in a fluoride‐polluted environment, acting as a natural sink. Ion exchange, membrane filtration, precipitation, coagulation, and biodegradation are the routinely adopted treatment techniques for F removal, which require high cost and involve complex mechanisms (Jha et al, 2013; Maitra et al, 2021; Mohapatra et al, 2009; Roy & Dass, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%