2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60332-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoride removal from brackish groundwater by direct contact membrane distillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these tests, 200 mL of a synthetic fluoride aqueous solution with a concentration of 3.9 mg/L was mixed with 10 g of the homemade bone char in a plastic bottle and then shaken in a water bath at room temperature. Samples were collected and analyzed at 2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20, and 24 hours. Sorption kinetics and isotherms for each size of bone char were then analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these tests, 200 mL of a synthetic fluoride aqueous solution with a concentration of 3.9 mg/L was mixed with 10 g of the homemade bone char in a plastic bottle and then shaken in a water bath at room temperature. Samples were collected and analyzed at 2,4,6,8,10,12,16,20, and 24 hours. Sorption kinetics and isotherms for each size of bone char were then analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective fluoride removal methods such as reverse osmosis [6,7] and membrane technology [8][9][10] are applied in many countries; however the high installation and maintenance costs of these methods generally preclude their use in poor countries. Low cost fluoride removal technologies, such as coagulation [11] and adsorption [12], are more acceptable in developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same feed flow rate, increasing the feed temperature enhanced the permeate flux. This trend may be explained by the Antoine equation which predicts an exponential relationship between the driving force (vapor pressure difference) and temperature (Hou et al, 2010). The permeate flux increased with the feed flow rate at the same feed temperature, but the effect of the feed rate on the membrane permeability was small.…”
Section: Effect Of Feed Temperature On Water Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD is a non-conventional technology that may be a feasible alternative to remove contaminants from water such as fluoride. Limited research has been conducted on the feasibility of MD technology to remove fluoride and although what has previously been done was on a very small scale [9][10][11]. Fluoride removal on a larger scale has not been reported to our knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%