“…The two dominant peaks centered at 284.5 and 285 eV for PBDT–F–COOH show a lower band energy than those for PBDT–F–COOH–PU (284.49 and 285 eV), all of which are attributed to the CC and C–C in the skeleton of CPs . The other three peaks for PBDT–F–COOH at around 285.49, 288.2, and 288.29 eV are assigned to C –S, O– C O, and C –F species, respectively. , Correspondingly, the other peaks for PBDT–F–COOH–PU at around 285.5, 286.25, and 288.29 eV are classified as C –S, O C –N, and C –F species, respectively. − In the C 1s spectrum of pre-PU, the peaks located at 284.73, 286.25, and 288.8 eV are attributed to C–C, O C –N, and O C N, respectively. − As expected, the O C N of pre-PU and carboxylic O– C O of PBDT–F–COOH disappear in the PBDT–F–COO–PU, while the content of O C –N species increases from 18.1 to 23.7%, indicating that the PBDT–F–COOH–PU was successfully synthesized through the polymerization between pre-PU and PBDT–F–COOH. The characteristic peak of 531.75 eV (NC O ) in pre-PU for the O 1s XPS spectra (Figure c) also disappears compared with the two dominant peaks of 532.0 eV ( O C) and 533.0 eV ( O –C) in PBDT–F–COOH–PU due to the formation of OC–N groups.…”