2019
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorine-18-Labeled Fluciclovine PET/CT in Clinical Practice: Factors Affecting the Rate of Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, relatively lower positivity rates on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT have been found by other studies (26,27), likely related to differences in mean PSA and PSA kinetics. Similar to other studies, we found that the detection rate of recurrent PCa on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT improves with increased PSA levels: 75.4% for PSA 1 ng/mL or lower and 90.9% for PSA higher than 1 ng/mL (19,25,28,29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, relatively lower positivity rates on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT have been found by other studies (26,27), likely related to differences in mean PSA and PSA kinetics. Similar to other studies, we found that the detection rate of recurrent PCa on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT improves with increased PSA levels: 75.4% for PSA 1 ng/mL or lower and 90.9% for PSA higher than 1 ng/mL (19,25,28,29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The whole-body positivity rate on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT was 79.7% in this study population, consistent with the reported positivity rates of 79.3% by Pernthaler (24) and 81% by Savir-Baruch (25). In contrast, relatively lower positivity rates on 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT have been found by other studies (26,27), likely related to differences in mean PSA and PSA kinetics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current literature provides inconsistent results on the role of PSA-dt as a predictor of PET/CT positivity. Some studies reported no statistically significant difference in DR between PSA-dt groups [9, 24], while others found the PSA-dt in patients with positive PET/CT was significantly shorter than PSA-dt in patients with negative findings [28]. In this study, the Mann-Whitney U test for PSA-dt yielded a BF 01 of 3.44.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Additionally, 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT showed low performance at high PSA levels too (sensitivity 59% for PSA >3 ng/mL) [23], and several studies found no significant difference in PSA between patients with positive and negative 18 Ffluciclovine PET/CT scans [9]. One possible explanation could be the presence of other factors that have been re-ported to influence 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT DR, such as the type of primary intervention, location of recurrence (prostatic vs. extraprostatic), and primary Gleason score [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Specifically, we did not perform a subgroup analysis for these factors due to the relatively small sample size; however, all of them were homogeneously distributed between the group samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positivity rates (PR)(25) were calculated for each imaging modality for various anatomic locations by dividing the number of patients with positive ndings in each anatomical area [intraprostatic, seminal vesicle (SV), penile bulb, bladder wall, pelvic lymph nodes (LN), extra-pelvic LN] by the total number of patients imaged with that modality. Lesions with available pathology results (ground truth) were used to calculate the positive predictive values (PPV) for both mpMRI and 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%