2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorine-free water-based Ni-rich positive electrodes and their performance in pouch- and 21700-type cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors could influence the overall performance. With the exception of those from Radloff et al., [45] the cells tested in the other studies were comparably small (< 100 mAh), which could also explain a higher performance compared to the 3 Ah cells tested here. The fact that the cells with coated NMC811 show a 20 % higher initial discharge capacity emphasizes the importance of the protection of the NMC811 during water contact in the cathode production.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These factors could influence the overall performance. With the exception of those from Radloff et al., [45] the cells tested in the other studies were comparably small (< 100 mAh), which could also explain a higher performance compared to the 3 Ah cells tested here. The fact that the cells with coated NMC811 show a 20 % higher initial discharge capacity emphasizes the importance of the protection of the NMC811 during water contact in the cathode production.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…It is likely that phosphate surface species were also present in that case. Several other groups achieved higher initial DCs of up to 190 mAh/g CAM [18,27,44,45] . However, a lower ratio of anode:cathode capacity (N/P) was used within these studies, i. e., between 1.2 : 1 and 1.15 : 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the check-up cycles, the cells were charged with a rate of 1 C. In the beginning of discharge, a 1 A discharge pulse (10 s) followed by a 10 A discharge pulse (1 s) was applied in order to measure the direct current internal resistance (DCIR). Then the cells were discharged at 0.2 C. The analysis of the DCIR values was performed in accordance with Radloff et al 44 Except of the check-up cycles, the discharge rate was 1 C in all cycling procedures for the 21700 cells.…”
Section: Cells-tablementioning
confidence: 99%