“…This method uses high-performance liquid chromatography to isolate the products, which is not suitable for rapid analysis of a large number of samples, and the reaction conditions are strict, which is not conducive to the detection of biological samples. − Alternatively, the adduct of ACR with protein or DNA can be detected using monoclonal antibodies, but this method is expensive, requires complex procedures, and has a delay of several hours between the production of ACR and the formation of the ACR adduct. , Therefore, in order to overcome the limitations of traditional methods, researchers have developed inexpensive and practical fluorescence probes for the determination of the ACR in biological samples. Few ACR fluorescent probes have been reported, which are further summarized in Table S1 (Supporting Information). − These probes are based on three different reaction types, including the formation of quinoline based on Skraup reaction, the formation of triazoline based on 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, and Michael addition between the thiol group of the probe and vinyl group of ACR (Figure ). However, the above strategies are more or less faced with the following disadvantages, such as strict reaction conditions, unable to achieve effective fluorescence signal changes after reaction and poor selectivity.…”