2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroquinolones and the risk of aortopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…analyses based on these studies indicate that fluoroquinolone is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of aortic dissection and rupture. 15,16 Results of our study are consistent with these epidemiological findings and meta-analyses, although the absolute risk increase is modest. However, there are three unique findings from our analysis:…”
Section: Re Sultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…analyses based on these studies indicate that fluoroquinolone is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of aortic dissection and rupture. 15,16 Results of our study are consistent with these epidemiological findings and meta-analyses, although the absolute risk increase is modest. However, there are three unique findings from our analysis:…”
Section: Re Sultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, in the secondary analysis, the HR for the association with fluoroquinolone use was 1.90 (95% CI, 1.22‐2.96, P < 0.05) for aortic aneurysm but not statistically significant for aortic dissection, HR 0.93 (95% CI, 0.38 to 2.29) . Two systematic meta‐analyses based on these studies indicate that fluoroquinolone is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of aortic dissection and rupture …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Four meta-analyses on this issue have been published, and we have summarized the details in Table 3. [2,7,23,24] Though the major result of our meta-analysis was consistent with that of these former meta-analyses, differences and new findings between our meta-analysis and the former studies should be noted. First, these meta-analyses included no more than five studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Meta-analysessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, our metaanalysis is the most up-to-date and the broadest analysis; our analysis consolidates the results of the former meta-analyses. Second, we found that three of these meta-analyses used the HR of aortic aneurysm to replace the HR of aortic diseases; [7,23,24] this may underestimate the risk of occurrence of aortic diseases. We excluded this study, [19] when pooling the ORs.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation