1987
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.149.4.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopic identification of torn intercarpal ligaments after injection of contrast material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With this technique, the injection process can be viewed dynamically, which can demonstrate communication between the adjacent compartments more precisely than conventional arthrography. 8,9 First, 0.4 mL of 0.5 mmol/mL gadolinium MR contrast agent can be diluted in 50 mL physiological saline solution and mixed with an equal amount of iodinated contrast agent. For the assessment of ligamentous lesions, a total of $1 to 2 mL of this solution can be administered with a 22-gauge needle injection into the distal radioulnar and the midcarpal compartment each, via a dorsal approach.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique, the injection process can be viewed dynamically, which can demonstrate communication between the adjacent compartments more precisely than conventional arthrography. 8,9 First, 0.4 mL of 0.5 mmol/mL gadolinium MR contrast agent can be diluted in 50 mL physiological saline solution and mixed with an equal amount of iodinated contrast agent. For the assessment of ligamentous lesions, a total of $1 to 2 mL of this solution can be administered with a 22-gauge needle injection into the distal radioulnar and the midcarpal compartment each, via a dorsal approach.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing imaging methods-bone scan, arthrogram, and even diagnostic arthroscopy-are all invasive and rather insensitive to diagnose grade I intrinsic ligament injury. 2,[47][48][49][50] Expensive but noninvasive MRI can be considered in this setting. However, the literature showing a significant variance in its sensitivity to grade I injury does not support the use of MRI in this setting.…”
Section: Ligament Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-phase arthrogram will likely have the sensitivity and specificity to accurately determine whether some portion of the ligament has a perforation, but this study does not permit staging of the presumed lesion. [48][49][50] Furthermore, the issue of distinguishing between an asymptomatic perforation or partial tear and one that is responsible for symptoms is a significant problem for arthrography in this setting. Many studies have shown that asymptomatic and mechanically insignificant degeneration and/or perforations of the intrinsic ligaments increase with age, particularly after the third decade of life.…”
Section: Ligament Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine arthroskopisch best ä tigte SL-Bandruptur wurde in der CT-Arthrografi e nicht erkannt. Bei der Beurteilung der CTArthrografi e ist zu ber ü cksichtigen, dass zwischen medio-und radiokarpalem Gelenkabschnitt vorbestehende, kommunizierende, degenerative Defekte oder Normvarianten des SL-Bandkomplexes wie der " pin-hole " -Defekt vorhanden sein k ö nnen [18,19] . Eine interkompartimentelle Kommunikation auf degenerativer Basis ist bereits ab dem 3.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified