2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopically Guided Implantation of Modern Cardiac Resynchronization Devices

Abstract: Radiation risks associated with fluoroscopically guided CRT procedures may be considerable. Present data may be used for the estimation of patient radiation risks from CRT procedures performed in other institutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27] To our knowledge, none of these studies directly linked cumulative exposure and cancer risk. We examined a cohort of patients who had acute myocardial infarction and measured the association between low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging and therapeutic procedures and the risk of cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25][26][27] To our knowledge, none of these studies directly linked cumulative exposure and cancer risk. We examined a cohort of patients who had acute myocardial infarction and measured the association between low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging and therapeutic procedures and the risk of cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. They also have shown that this exceed threshold dose for the induction of skin effects [10]. An other study addressing the operator's side of the problem demonstrated that the radiation exposure of the hands is approximately 9.2 mSv, and the other part of the body as 1.2 mSv [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, the median effective dose (E) to the patient per procedure was estimated. For this purpose, the contribution of each projection (PA; right anterior oblique, RAO; left anterior oblique, LAO; cranial, CR; caudal, CAUD; lateral, LAT) to the total P KA was estimated by a review of the literature [7,[24][25][26][27] and discussion with cardiologists and radiographers. P KA to E conversion factors were calculated for the aforementioned projections, using the PCXMC 2.0 (http://www.stuk.fi/pcxmc) Monte Carlo-based software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%