1992
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(92)72922-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopically Guided Percutaneous Gastrostomy in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a superior technical success rate of 97% to 100% reported in literature for the IG technique [9][10][11][12]. Most conversions were because of anatomic difficulties such as scoliosis and high position of the stomach with a narrow subcostal angle, which are more likely to be present in neurologically impaired children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corresponds to a superior technical success rate of 97% to 100% reported in literature for the IG technique [9][10][11][12]. Most conversions were because of anatomic difficulties such as scoliosis and high position of the stomach with a narrow subcostal angle, which are more likely to be present in neurologically impaired children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, some published reports of minor complications took only wound site problems into account [17], whereas other reports also included delayed feeds and tube-related issues [11,12]. In addition, some patients may experience more than a single complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastrostomy, as a means for long-term enteral access, is well established in paediatric practice. Options for gastrostomy tube placement include the open method, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement, percutaneous placement under image guidance [3,10], and, most recently, laparoscopic gastrostomy placement [12]. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [1] has in recent years become the "gold standard" [15] but due to recognised complications [2,7,8,13] alternative minimally invasive methods are being sought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One interventional radiologist used glucagon as standard practice, whereas the others used glucagon only when it was difficult to delineate the stomach. RIG was performed using biplane fluoroscopy, with preplacement ultrasonography for localization of the liver. An orogastric snare was passed and the stomach punctured under fluoroscopic guidance with an 18‐G needle, which was used to insert a stiff 0·035‐inch guidewire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%