2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0072-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopy-controlled voiding cystourethrography in infants and children: Are the radiation risks trivial?

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the gonadal dose, effective dose and relevant radiogenic risks associated with pediatric patients undergoing voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). Exposure parameters were monitored in 118 consecutive children undergoing VCUG. The entrance surface dose (ESD) was determined by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). For male patients, the gonadal dose was determined by TLDs attached on the anterior scrotum. For female patients, the gonadal dose was estimated by converting ES… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More and more effort is focused on dose-intensive fluoroscopy examinations. At the international level, the results of several investigations of patients' doses have been published in the recent literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Since the dose-intensive examinations involving fluoroscopy may result in a significant risk of deterministic effects, notably to the skin, it is recommended that the entrance surface doses be monitored for preventing skin injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More and more effort is focused on dose-intensive fluoroscopy examinations. At the international level, the results of several investigations of patients' doses have been published in the recent literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Since the dose-intensive examinations involving fluoroscopy may result in a significant risk of deterministic effects, notably to the skin, it is recommended that the entrance surface doses be monitored for preventing skin injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although controversial, there is no known dose threshold at which cancer risk increases, and although the dose for a single procedure might be low, serial followup examinations result in higher cumulative doses. The radiation risk for cancer induction associated with a typical MCUG is around 1 in 10,000 [10]. Where MR is not available due to resource limitation, then the risk of MCUG may be considered justifiable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reliability of MCUG is dependent on the severity of reflux: only high-grade reflux is shown at MCUG with 100% reliability, and VUR itself may be intermittent [7][8][9]. MCUG carries a significant radiation burden [10] particularly to the paediatric gonads, and many of the children imaged are normal. Other imaging techniques have been used for demonstrating VUR in children (radionuclide cystography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound methods), but MCUG is considered the reference standard as it also permits imaging of the urethra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it may also cause anxiety for patients and families due to its invasive nature, 16 and carries a risk of radiation exposure 17 and iatrogenic UTI. 18 When weighing the …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Radiation exposure (~0.5-3.2 mSv) 28 is also important to consider, as it potentially has long-term implications for infertility, cancer risk, etc. 17 While VUR is a risk factor, it should be emphasized again that pyelonephritis can occur in the absence of VUR. 8 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%