2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1216-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Vertebral Body Biopsy Using a Novel Drill-Powered Device: Technical Case Series

Abstract: A drill-assisted, coaxial biopsy system can be used to safely obtain vertebral body core specimens under fluoroscopic guidance. The higher bone core yield obtained with drill assistance may be offset by the presence of crush artifact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study finds that the accuracy of spinal biopsy is 83.3%, which is consistent with other studies with an accuracy of spinal biopsy ranging from 16.1% to 92.7% [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Fluoroscopy-guided spinal biopsy has higher accuracy compared to CT-guided biopsy (86.6% vs. 80%), but it is not statistically significant (p = 0.731).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study finds that the accuracy of spinal biopsy is 83.3%, which is consistent with other studies with an accuracy of spinal biopsy ranging from 16.1% to 92.7% [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Fluoroscopy-guided spinal biopsy has higher accuracy compared to CT-guided biopsy (86.6% vs. 80%), but it is not statistically significant (p = 0.731).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The radiation exposure to the operating personnel is 26 times higher in the CT-guided group compared to the fluoroscopy-guided group [3]. Despite the poorer spatial resolution, fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of spinal lesions has been proven to be a feasible alternative to CT-guided biopsy [3,[11][12][13]. Nevertheless, there is limited literature from developing countries that compare the two methods of biopsy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of pathologic analysis of bone specimens can be impacted by artifacts and alterations incurred during the biopsy procedure. While some studies suggest that a rotary-powered device yields a cohesive sample with rare exceptions [2] , [3] , [4] , other studies caution that drill-assisted devices can contribute to crush artifact and shorter lengths of assessable marrow [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] . Operators of the powered system have voiced anecdotal concerns over thermal artifact or burn related to friction, however several studies assessing specimen artifacts did not identify thermal damage [ 5 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though initially designed and marketed for bone marrow biopsy, clinical applications have expanded to include percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy of the spine and appendicular skeleton. 3,4 Herein, we report the use of this novel device to perform two CT-guided percutaneous skull biopsies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%