2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorouracil in the environment: Analysis, occurrence, degradation and transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average pH values were acidic and within a range acceptable for topical application. This was a favorable pH as 5-fluorouracil is a weakly acidic drug with an acid dissociation constant (pKa) of 8.0 (26). As calculated according to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, 98% of the drug in the 5-fluorouracil lotions was unionized and 96% of the drug in the 5-fluorouracil Pheroid™ lotions was unionized at the pH of the formulations.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The average pH values were acidic and within a range acceptable for topical application. This was a favorable pH as 5-fluorouracil is a weakly acidic drug with an acid dissociation constant (pKa) of 8.0 (26). As calculated according to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, 98% of the drug in the 5-fluorouracil lotions was unionized and 96% of the drug in the 5-fluorouracil Pheroid™ lotions was unionized at the pH of the formulations.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Anticancer concentrations in mixture ranged from tenths of ng/L to hundreds of μg/L, which represent comparable concentration ranges than have been previously measured in wastewater. 5-FU was found in the hospital and municipal wastewaters at concentrations in the range <5 ng/ L to 124 μg/L (Mahnik et al 2004Kovalova et al 2009;Kosjek et al 2013);CDDP was detected, as Pt compound, at concentrations in the range of 2-250 μg/L (Lenz (Yin et al 2010;FerrandoCliment et al 2014); IM concentrations in aquatic systems are not known to date, probably because its occurrence is below the limit of detection (36-54 ng/L) (Negreira et al 2013(Negreira et al , 2014. However, Besse et al (2012) estimated environmental concentration for this drug in France, based on excretion rates, at 5 ng/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, scientists did not have the technology nor the know-how to measure environmental levels of anticancer drugs and only a limited number of laboratories worldwide are analysing them in environmental and wastewater samples (Česen et al 2015;Ferrando-Climent et al 2014, 2013Kosjek and Heath 2011;Kosjek et al 2015Kosjek et al , 2013Llewellyn et al 2011;Negreira et al 2014aNegreira et al , 2013aParrella et al 2014). One reason is their low environmental levels (≤ ng L −1 ), which require the very latest in modern analytical instrumentation, and possibly their toxicity makes laboratories reluctant to analyse these compounds since additional safety protocols and waste collection must be in place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%