2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05209_11.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flutamide-induced photosensitivity: is it a forme fruste of lupus?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there seemed to have been a general agreement that patch and photopatch testing is unhelpful in the investigation of photosensitivity induced by flutamide. Some cases have been published with negative results (3, 4), others without such testing even having been published (6–8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, there seemed to have been a general agreement that patch and photopatch testing is unhelpful in the investigation of photosensitivity induced by flutamide. Some cases have been published with negative results (3, 4), others without such testing even having been published (6–8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various side‐effects have been described, including toxic hepatitis, gynaecomastia, mastodynia, hot flushes and gastrointestinal alterations. To date, few cases of cutaneous photosensitivity reactions in patients treated with flutamide (1–8) have been published, with varying results of photoallergic investigation. There are also some published cases of pseudoporphyria and lupus‐like reactions (8–11) after oral intake of flutamide, in which light is a relevant pathogenic mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reports on cutaneous photosensitivity reactions in patients taking flutamide for prostate carcinoma (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Photo-patch tests (4,8) and patch test (8) with flutamide have been positive in such patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%