2016
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluvial to tidal transition in proximal, mixed tide‐influenced and wave‐influenced deltaic deposits: Cretaceous lower Sego Sandstone, Utah, USA

Abstract: 11Facies models for regressive, tide-influenced deltaic systems are under-represented in the literature 12 compared with their fluvial-and wave-dominated counterparts. Here a facies model is presented of 13 the mixed, tide-and wave-influenced deltaic strata of the Sego Sandstone, which was deposited in 14 and relative sea-level controls and autocyclic delta lobe abandonment. 32

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(194 reference statements)
8
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable vertical facies successions have been observed in the following examples: (i) tidedominated Holocene-Modern Fly River delta (Dalrymple et al, 2003); (ii) tide-dominated Late Eocene Dir Abu Lifa Member (Western Desert, Egypt) (Legler et al, 2013); (iii) mixed waveinfluenced and tide-influenced deltaic successions in the Cretaceous Bearpaw-Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Ainsworth et al, 2015); (iv) mixed wave-influenced and tide-influenced deltaic successions in the Cretaceous Lower Sego Sandstone (Legler et al, 2014;van Cappelle et al, 2016), and (v) fluvial-dominated, tide-influenced deltaic successions in the Middle Jurassic Lajas Formation (Gugliotta et al, 2015;Gugliotta et al, 2016a;Gugliotta et al, 2016b;.…”
Section: Type C2: Sandstone-dominated To Heterolithic Channel Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable vertical facies successions have been observed in the following examples: (i) tidedominated Holocene-Modern Fly River delta (Dalrymple et al, 2003); (ii) tide-dominated Late Eocene Dir Abu Lifa Member (Western Desert, Egypt) (Legler et al, 2013); (iii) mixed waveinfluenced and tide-influenced deltaic successions in the Cretaceous Bearpaw-Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Ainsworth et al, 2015); (iv) mixed wave-influenced and tide-influenced deltaic successions in the Cretaceous Lower Sego Sandstone (Legler et al, 2014;van Cappelle et al, 2016), and (v) fluvial-dominated, tide-influenced deltaic successions in the Middle Jurassic Lajas Formation (Gugliotta et al, 2015;Gugliotta et al, 2016a;Gugliotta et al, 2016b;.…”
Section: Type C2: Sandstone-dominated To Heterolithic Channel Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slingerland, ), but simulations have only investigated tidal amplitude (Slingerland, ; Wells et al ., ,b, , ,b) and bed shear stress (Mitchell et al ., , ) in ancient epicontinental seaways. Furthermore, since the initial palaeotidal modelling studies, there have been improvements in current understanding of shoreline–shelf process classification (Ainsworth et al ., ; Vakarelov & Ainsworth, ), the recognition of ancient mixed‐process stratigraphy (MacEachern & Bann, ; Ainsworth et al ., ; Buatois et al ., ; Rossi & Steel, ; van Cappelle et al ., ), and the controls on tide, wave and fluvial processes (Ainsworth et al ., ; Nyberg & Howell, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gingras et al ., ), with the exception of sandbar tops experiencing reduced sedimentation rates (e.g. van Cappelle et al ., ) (Fig. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%