2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux balance analysis: A geometric perspective

Abstract: a b s t r a c tAdvances in the field of bioinformatics have led to reconstruction of genome-scale networks for a number of key organisms. The application of physicochemical constraints to these stoichiometric networks allows researchers, through methods such as flux balance analysis, to highlight key sets of reactions necessary to achieve particular objectives. The key benefits of constraint-based analysis lie in the minimal knowledge required to infer systemic properties. However, network degeneracy leads to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying FVA reveals the equivalence of R1, R2, and R3, with each taking a flux value of between 0 and 1, emphasizing both the inability of the constraints to produce a unique solution and the potential existence of alternative flux distributions to the one picked by conventional FBA. Geometric FBA (Smallbone and Simeonidis, 2009), which identifies a unique flux solution that corresponds to the center of the optimal flux solution space, predicts an equal division of flux between R1, R2, and R3 and a flux of 1 unit through R4. As an alternative to these established methods, using 1,000 sets of randomly chosen weighting factors and averaging the flux solutions gave predicted fluxes of approximately onethird through R1, R2, and R3, five-sixths through R4, and one-sixth through R5 and R6 (Table I).…”
Section: Cost-weighted Flux Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Applying FVA reveals the equivalence of R1, R2, and R3, with each taking a flux value of between 0 and 1, emphasizing both the inability of the constraints to produce a unique solution and the potential existence of alternative flux distributions to the one picked by conventional FBA. Geometric FBA (Smallbone and Simeonidis, 2009), which identifies a unique flux solution that corresponds to the center of the optimal flux solution space, predicts an equal division of flux between R1, R2, and R3 and a flux of 1 unit through R4. As an alternative to these established methods, using 1,000 sets of randomly chosen weighting factors and averaging the flux solutions gave predicted fluxes of approximately onethird through R1, R2, and R3, five-sixths through R4, and one-sixth through R5 and R6 (Table I).…”
Section: Cost-weighted Flux Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FVA and geometric FBA were performed in ScrumPy following the algorithms described by Mahadevan and Schilling (2003) and Smallbone and Simeonidis (2009), respectively.…”
Section: Fba and Cost-weighted Flux Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recent methods for determining metabolic fluxes often optimize a biological objective function such a growth or ATP production. A well-known method that uses this strategy is flux balance analysis [9,12,23]. However for eukaryotic cells a biological objective function is often not easy to determine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provide metrics about the connectedness of the network; elementary flux mode analysis provides a unique decomposition of the network in minimal subsets that are capable of operating independently. By joining extra quantivative information about input and output fluxes, the network can also be studied using flux balance analysis [3]. These methods require little amount of molecular information, however they are only able to provide a restricted number of steady state properties of the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%