2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux Correction Tools for Finite Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
241
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
241
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that our scheme provides a much sharper resolution in comparison with the second-order high-resolution scheme of Osher and Sethian [23]. Let us note that in contrast to the classical works of Boris, Book and their collaborators, we derive the essential information for our algorithms on the discrete basis, while compared to the approach of Kuzmin and Turek [18] our proceeding is technically relatively simple. Furthermore, both mentioned FCT approaches rely on an underlying additive splitting of the backward diffusion into fluxes between computational nodes: especially in the multidimensional case, the mentioned works proceed along the considerations of Zalesak [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It turns out that our scheme provides a much sharper resolution in comparison with the second-order high-resolution scheme of Osher and Sethian [23]. Let us note that in contrast to the classical works of Boris, Book and their collaborators, we derive the essential information for our algorithms on the discrete basis, while compared to the approach of Kuzmin and Turek [18] our proceeding is technically relatively simple. Furthermore, both mentioned FCT approaches rely on an underlying additive splitting of the backward diffusion into fluxes between computational nodes: especially in the multidimensional case, the mentioned works proceed along the considerations of Zalesak [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In some newer works mainly concerned with finite element schemes, antidiffusive fluxes are computed by algebraic properties of the entries of corresponding stiffness matrices, see e.g. [18] and the references therein. We employ a different approach motivated by the theory of numerical methods for conservation laws, compare e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new error indicators were applied to algebraic flux correction [14][15][16][17][18][19] schemes which were successfully equipped with grid adaptivity. The highly unstructured meshes resulting from local mesh refinement/coarsening call for fully implicit discretizations which are unconditionally stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bisection process continues for all adjacent triangles sharing a hanging node with the refined element until all irregular grid points have been removed from the mesh. However, longest-edge bisection is mainly designed to uphold some geometric properties of the initial mesh and, thus, may not be the best comrade for our algebraic flux correction techniques [16][17][18][19] . For each element that needs to be refined due to accuracy reasons, the propagation path solely depends on the mesh geometry and does not account for the local solution behavior.…”
Section: Limited Gradient Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation