2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-002-0001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux Homomorphisms and Principal Bundles over Infinite Dimensional Manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the results of [40] and also with the general relation between holonomies on homogeneous spaces and symplectic fluxes (see e.g. [43]), although we are not aware of any reference that describes analogous observations for semi-direct products. In the context of Thomas precession, the phase (4.19) is generally neglected, precisely because it is blind to spin; for the same reason, from now on we let the translational path α(t) be constant (α = 0) so that the only non-zero contribution to the Berry holonomy (4.17) comes from its rotational piece.…”
Section: Energy Eigenstatessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the results of [40] and also with the general relation between holonomies on homogeneous spaces and symplectic fluxes (see e.g. [43]), although we are not aware of any reference that describes analogous observations for semi-direct products. In the context of Thomas precession, the phase (4.19) is generally neglected, precisely because it is blind to spin; for the same reason, from now on we let the translational path α(t) be constant (α = 0) so that the only non-zero contribution to the Berry holonomy (4.17) comes from its rotational piece.…”
Section: Energy Eigenstatessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For a discussion of the relation between quantomorphisms and Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms, extending some of these structures, such as Kostant's Theorem ( [Kos70]) to infinite dimensional manifolds, we refer to [NV03].…”
Section: Theorem V28 If G Is a Connected Lie Group And S : G → Autmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…φm : G → M , g → g · m, for any m ∈ M [17]. 26 Principal bundle automorphisms are diffeomorphisms which commute with the right action of the structure group on P .…”
Section: An Equivalent Action With Manifest Symmetry and Localitymentioning
confidence: 99%