1971
DOI: 10.1038/231044a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux Ratios and Isotope Interaction in an Ion Exchange Membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for nonelectrolytes only concentration driving forces are operative. Using this approach, Ussing and Johansen showed that in the toad skin net flow of urea enhanced the unidirectional flux of tracer sucrose in the same direction (influx), and retarded the efflux [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Similar interaction between urea and mannitol was demonstrated by Biber and Curran in toad skin [1], and by Franz, Galey, and Van Bruggen in frog skin [3].…”
Section: Absence Of Hydrostatic Pressure Difference (Ap =0)supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, for nonelectrolytes only concentration driving forces are operative. Using this approach, Ussing and Johansen showed that in the toad skin net flow of urea enhanced the unidirectional flux of tracer sucrose in the same direction (influx), and retarded the efflux [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Similar interaction between urea and mannitol was demonstrated by Biber and Curran in toad skin [1], and by Franz, Galey, and Van Bruggen in frog skin [3].…”
Section: Absence Of Hydrostatic Pressure Difference (Ap =0)supporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, it is appreciated that other mechanisms may be operative [4,5,8,13]. Experimental studies of ion transport have demonstrated negative isotope interaction in synthetic membranes which are unlikely to be traversed by carriers [2,9]. The present theoretical study demonstrates that both positive and negative isotope interaction can be the simple consequence of membrane heterogeneity, even for uncomplicated passive transport of nonelectrolytes.…”
Section: Jvcmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The deviation from unity in the ratio RX/R (= P/P*) in the experiments of these authors [3,6] is clearly caused by interactions between the solute particles of a single species ("isotope interaction"), while the deviation seen in toad bladder may not be attributable to this phenomenon because it varies with the nature of the anion accompanying sodium [-1]. An adequate explanation for this interesting property of biological membranes is as yet lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, substantial differences between tracer and bulk diffusion coefficients for various solutes have been observed in both artificial [3] and biological [1] membranes. Such differences can be produced by (1) coupling between the flows of tracer and abundant species, (2) unstirred layers, (3) coupling between the flow of the test species and other solutes or the solvent, (4) the presence of fixed or mobile carriers within the membrane, (5) electroosmosis, (6) concentration polarization, or (7) other unknown mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that several considerations prevent the use of the flux ratio for the precise evaluation of energetic parameters [4,6,10,12,17,20,24,25]. It is perhaps not .generally appreciated however that, even when leakage is minimal and unaffected by experimental procedures, passive tracer flux may make the flux ratio grossly misleading.…”
Section: The Flux Ratio; Influence Of Leakagementioning
confidence: 96%