Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
SummaryTo robustly and accurately simulate wall‐bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall‐modeled large‐eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high‐order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high‐order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under‐resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall‐normal direction of wall‐adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number () shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non‐equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high‐order DFEMs.
SummaryTo robustly and accurately simulate wall‐bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers, we propose suitable boundary treatments for wall‐modeled large‐eddy simulation (WMLES) coupled with a high‐order flux reconstruction (FR) method. First, we show the need to impose an auxiliary boundary condition on auxiliary variables (solution gradients) that are commonly introduced in high‐order discontinuous finite element methods (DFEMs). Auxiliary boundary conditions are introduced in WMLES, where the grid resolution is too coarse to resolve the inner layer of a turbulent boundary layer. Another boundary treatment to further enhance stability with under‐resolved grids, is the use of a modal filter only in the wall‐normal direction of wall‐adjacent cells to remove the oscillations. A grid convergence study of turbulent channel flow with a high Reynolds number () shows that the present WMLES framework accurately predicts velocity profiles, Reynolds shear stress, and skin friction coefficients at the grid resolutions recommended in the literature. It was confirmed that a small amount of filtering is sufficient to stabilize computation, with negligible influence on prediction accuracy. In addition, non‐equilibrium periodic hill flow with a curved wall, including flow separation, reattachment, and acceleration at a high Reynolds number (), is reported. Considering stability and the prediction accuracy, we recommend a loose auxiliary wall boundary conditions with a less steep velocity gradient for WMLES using high‐order DFEMs.
The massive flow separation in the flow around a circular cylinder is challenging for the large-eddy simulation (LES) using the traditional equilibrium wall model (EQWM) for accurate prediction. To address this problem, a data-driven-non-equilibrium wall model (DNEQWM) was developed based on the result of the high-fidelity wall-resolved LES (WRLES) and the theoretical analysis. A hybrid modeling strategy was adopted in DNEQWM to deal with different flow regions. An empirical formula based on the analysis of the WRLES result was used to compute the wall shear stress in the attached region while the integration of the Navier–Stokes (N–S) equation was used in the separated region. Both EQWM and DNEQWM were applied to the LES of the flow around a circular cylinder at a classical Reynolds number of 3900 to evaluate the performance of the new model. It was found that DNEQWM was significantly superior to EQWM based on the analyses of the results of global flow quantities, surface pressure distributions, and flow details of mean and fluctuation velocities and the Reynolds stress in the wake. Flow visualizations indicated that DNEQWM can effectively reproduce the phenomenon of alternative periodic vortex shedding in the wake. The computational cost of DNEQWM was slightly lower than that of EQWM and significantly less than that of WRLES. This study presents a practical methodology for the wall model for the LES of the flow around the bluff body with smooth curved surfaces.
High-order methods have demonstrated orders of magnitude reduction in computational cost for large eddy simulation (LES) over low-order methods in the past decade. Most such simulations are wall-resolved implicit LES (ILES) without an explicit sub-grid scale (SGS) model. The use of high-order ILES for severely under-resolved LES such as wall-modeled LES (WMLES) often runs into robustness and accuracy issues due to the low dissipation embedded in these methods. In the present study, we investigate the performance of several popular SGS models, the static Smagorinsky model, the wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity (WALE) model and the Vreman model, to improve the robustness and accuracy of under-resolved LES using high-order methods. The models are implemented in the high-order unstructured grid LES solver called hpMusic based on the discontinuous flux reconstruction method. The length scales in these SGS models are calibrated using the direct numerical simulation (DNS) database for the turbulent channel flow problem. The Vreman model has been found to produce the most accurate and consistent results with a proper choice of the length scale for WMLES.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.