2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux variability from ejecta in structured relativistic jets with large-scale magnetic fields

Abstract: Context. Standing and moving shocks in relativistic astrophysical jets are very promising sites for particle acceleration to large Lorentz factors and for the emission from the radio up to the γ-ray band. They are thought to be responsible for at least part of the observed variability in radio-loud active galactic nuclei. Aims. We aim to simulate the interactions of moving shock waves with standing recollimation shocks in structured and magnetized relativistic jets and to characterize the profiles of connected… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To trigger internal re-collimation shock patterns inside the jet, we assume that the jet is over-pressured compared to the ambient medium with a fixed pressure ratio of p jet /p am = 1.5 (Gómez et al 1997) and a ratio of the rest mass density of ρ jet /ρ am = 10 −2 . As we apply a constant density and pressure profile in the ambient medium and as the jet inlet is cylindrical, we expect to observe only an intrinsic jet opening angle of small amplitude (Fichet de Clairfontaine et al 2021). While this configuration does not reproduce the jet opening that is observed on the average (Pushkarev et al 2017), the objective here is to study the strong interaction of the moving shock with multiple stationary shocks.…”
Section: Setup Of the Variable Jet Scenariomentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To trigger internal re-collimation shock patterns inside the jet, we assume that the jet is over-pressured compared to the ambient medium with a fixed pressure ratio of p jet /p am = 1.5 (Gómez et al 1997) and a ratio of the rest mass density of ρ jet /ρ am = 10 −2 . As we apply a constant density and pressure profile in the ambient medium and as the jet inlet is cylindrical, we expect to observe only an intrinsic jet opening angle of small amplitude (Fichet de Clairfontaine et al 2021). While this configuration does not reproduce the jet opening that is observed on the average (Pushkarev et al 2017), the objective here is to study the strong interaction of the moving shock with multiple stationary shocks.…”
Section: Setup Of the Variable Jet Scenariomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the γ-ray range, these knots cannot be resolved, but the high-energy emission is usually attributed, at least in part, to compact regions inside the jet, due to the observed very rapid variability. Quasi-stationary knots may be interpreted as re-collimation shocks, naturally occurring in overpressured jets (Marscher et al 2008;Fromm et al 2013a;Hervet et al 2017;Fichet de Clairfontaine et al 2021). This mechanism is for example widely accepted to explain the HST-1 radio knot in the nearby radio-galaxy M 87 (Stawarz et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shock is thus mildly relativistic for κ of the order of unity. The angle θ j< − α may however show a different behaviour in jets where recollimation shocks arise from a difference in pressure between jet components and the ambient medium (e.g., Fichet de Clairfontaine et al 2021).…”
Section: Oblique Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demands radiation models beyond the one-zone model. While MHD, RMHD and GRMHD codes have improved (and continue to do so) to model jets on vast scales (e.g., Chatterjee et al 2020;Dong et al 2020;Fichet de Clairfontaine et al 2021), the efficient calculation of all kinds of radiation processes (for a recent review, see Cerruti 2020) is best done with kinetic models. In such models, the kinetic equation governing the particle distribution under influences of acceleration, cooling and other losses, is solved along the jet flow by cutting the jet into numerous slices and imposing a fixed jet geometry and bulk-flow evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%