2011
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2011.608168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluxes and production pathways of nitrous oxide in different types of tropical forest soils in Thailand

Abstract: Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from the soil surface of five different forest types in Thailand were measured using the closed chamber method. Soil samples were also taken to study the N 2 O production pathways. The monthly average emissions (AESD, n ¼ 12) of N 2 O from dry evergreen forest (DEF), hill evergreen forest (HEF), moist evergreen forest (MEF), mixed deciduous forest (MDF) and acacia reforestation (ARF) were 13.0 AE 8.2, 5.7 AE 7.1, 1.2 AE 12.1, 7.3 AE 8.5 and 16.7 AE 9.2 mg N m À2 h À1, respective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rain event-based sampling would need to be repeated over time to capture seasonality dynamics as the occurrence and magnitude of N 2 O pulses are expected to change with the availability of C and N sources that vary in time due to fertilizer N inputs and crop growth. Soil fluxes might actually shift from positive to negative sources for N 2 O late in the season if soil N 2 O consumption (i.e., conversion to N 2 ) increases due to consumption favored by high labile C abundances when nitrate availability is low (Davidsson & Leonardson, 1997;van Groenigen et al, 2015;Vanitchung et al, 2011). Both the consumption of soil-produced N 2 O before it reaches the atmosphere, and the conversion of atmospheric N 2 O, which diffuses into soils that have lower N 2 O concentrations (Clough et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2013), can result in reduced net N 2 O fluxes or even negative fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rain event-based sampling would need to be repeated over time to capture seasonality dynamics as the occurrence and magnitude of N 2 O pulses are expected to change with the availability of C and N sources that vary in time due to fertilizer N inputs and crop growth. Soil fluxes might actually shift from positive to negative sources for N 2 O late in the season if soil N 2 O consumption (i.e., conversion to N 2 ) increases due to consumption favored by high labile C abundances when nitrate availability is low (Davidsson & Leonardson, 1997;van Groenigen et al, 2015;Vanitchung et al, 2011). Both the consumption of soil-produced N 2 O before it reaches the atmosphere, and the conversion of atmospheric N 2 O, which diffuses into soils that have lower N 2 O concentrations (Clough et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2013), can result in reduced net N 2 O fluxes or even negative fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the reported study, soil N 2 O production and consumption were mainly influenced by the amount of mineral N in soils, and low N availability was linked with N 2 O emissions [2]. Highly dynamic emissions of N 2 O were found among different forest soil types [68]. The primary controlling factors of N 2 O production were found to be soil pH and C/N ratio, and these soil properties could explain most of the variability of N 2 O emissions [9,69].…”
Section: Factors Affecting Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%