2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00125-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
74
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a more limited range of solutes, very similar behaviour to that shown in Figure 9 was measured for an n-heptane solvent, albeit with rejections ~5% below those recorded for xylene due to the increased membrane swelling. It is noted that zero rejections were previously reported by van der Bruggen et al 8 , who studied the behaviour of a 340 g mol -1 solute in a range of solvents with an MPF-50 membrane. They found that solute rejection was zero in n-hexane (but not in other solvents), and speculatively suggested that contact with organic solvents increases the mobility of the polymeric chains in the membrane to allow unhindered transport of solvent and solute.…”
Section: Effects Of Solute Sizementioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a more limited range of solutes, very similar behaviour to that shown in Figure 9 was measured for an n-heptane solvent, albeit with rejections ~5% below those recorded for xylene due to the increased membrane swelling. It is noted that zero rejections were previously reported by van der Bruggen et al 8 , who studied the behaviour of a 340 g mol -1 solute in a range of solvents with an MPF-50 membrane. They found that solute rejection was zero in n-hexane (but not in other solvents), and speculatively suggested that contact with organic solvents increases the mobility of the polymeric chains in the membrane to allow unhindered transport of solvent and solute.…”
Section: Effects Of Solute Sizementioning
confidence: 62%
“…This hypothesis was seemingly contradicted by the authors themselves as the measured solvent flux-pressure relationship remained linear over the tested pressure range. van der Bruggen et al 8 also studied solute rejection with an MPF-50 membrane, and again reported the extent of solute rejection to depend on the solvent type. Interestingly, the rejection in low-polarity solvents was found to be reduced when compared with that observed with polar solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PSCMS-g-DGEBA/AuNPsPSNPs membranes showed lower flux compared with some commercial nanofiltration membranes such as MPF 50. The commercial membranes have a flux as high as 1600 l/m 2 h at a 20 bar transmembrane pressure (Van der Bruggen et al 2002). In this research, we have employed phase inversion technique to obtain skinned porous asymmetric membranes.…”
Section: Membrane Properties and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect might be due to the modification of the membrane surface polarity caused by the alcohol permeation. n-Propyl alcohol is slightly less polar than ethyl alcohol (dipole moments: ethyl alcohol 1.69 D, n-propyl alcohol 1.68 D, n-butyl alcohol 1.63 D), and immersion in less polar solvents may cause agglomeration of hydrophobic and hydrophilic sites on the membrane surface (van der Bruggen et al, 2002). Consequently, membranes may have their hydrophilicity reduced and the hexane flux could be increased.…”
Section: Membrane Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%