2018 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/apec.2018.8341306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flyback converter with hybrid clamp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the transformer also functions as an inductor. To prevent from potential saturation and clamping the voltage spike, a demagnetizing path, RCD clamping circuit [21]- [23] is used as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: A Open Loop Simulation Using Psimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the transformer also functions as an inductor. To prevent from potential saturation and clamping the voltage spike, a demagnetizing path, RCD clamping circuit [21]- [23] is used as shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: A Open Loop Simulation Using Psimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed comparison shown in TABLE IV proves the effectiveness of the optimal design procedure given in Chapter III. The peak efficiency of converters built in [35] and [36] is 96.4% and 96.25%, respectively. However, these converters are operating at a low frequency around 200 kHz.…”
Section: Experiments Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft-switching concepts, such as active-clamp flyback (ACF) [Fig. 2 (left)] [13], [14], [20]- [24], or operating in discontinuous conduction mode, as suggested in [21], reduce the losses at turn on, but increase the complexity of the power stage and the control, and the losses at the turn off remain high for most approaches. Furthermore, soft switching in ACF converters requires a minimum negative inductor current, which reduces the light-load efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%