2010
DOI: 10.1021/es902530z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flying into the Future: Aviation Emissions Scenarios to 2050

Abstract: This study describes the methodology and results for calculating future global aviation emissions of carbon dioxide and oxides of nitrogen from air traffic under four of the IPCC/SRES (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change/Special Report on Emissions Scenarios) marker scenarios: A1B, A2, B1, and B2. In addition, a mitigation scenario has been calculated for the B1 scenario, requiring rapid and significant technology development and transition. A global model of aircraft movements and emissions (FAST) was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
126
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wilkerson et al, 2010). Air traffic growth is projected in all three regions, particularly in the tropics; for example, Owen et al (2010) predict 5 times as much air traffic in some regions in 2050 compared to 2000 for the A2 scenario (their Fig. 2) used in the 2007 IPCC assessment (Riahi et al, 2007), on which the RCP8.5 scenario is based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilkerson et al, 2010). Air traffic growth is projected in all three regions, particularly in the tropics; for example, Owen et al (2010) predict 5 times as much air traffic in some regions in 2050 compared to 2000 for the A2 scenario (their Fig. 2) used in the 2007 IPCC assessment (Riahi et al, 2007), on which the RCP8.5 scenario is based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates and assumptions around technology and operational change, they determine future levels of emissions (Eyring, Kohler, Lauer, & Lemper, 2005;Lee et al, 2009;Owen & Lee, 2010). Others focus more on CO 2 cost abatement potential relative to a business-as-usual scenario (Eide, Longva, Hoffmann, Oyvind, & Dalsoen, 2011;McCollum, Gould, & Greene, 2009), while some go beyond using SRES to estimate levels of future CO 2 by taking into account industry-specific demand assumptions (Macintosh & Wallace, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the rate of growth in tourism is increasing at a significantly higher rate than efficiency gains (WEF, 2009), the absolute contribution of tourism to climate change is increasing and, without substantial change, will continue to grow in the foreseeable future (Dubois et al, 2011;Gössling, 2013;Gössling, Hall, Peeters & Scott, 2010;Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013;Owens et al, 2010;Peeters & Dubois, 2010;Peeters & Landré, 2012). There are limits to efficiency gains.…”
Section: Tourism and Climate Change: Research And Responsementioning
confidence: 99%