Flying with the wind: scale dependency of speed and direction measurements in modelling wind support in avian flight

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding how environmental conditions, especially wind, influence birds' flight speeds is a prerequisite for understanding many important aspects of bird flight, including optimal migration strategies, navigation, and compensation for wind drift. Recent developments in tracking technology and the increased availability of data on large-scale weather patterns have made it possible to use path annotation to link the location of animals to environmental conditions such as wind speed and direction. However, there are various measures available for describing not only wind conditions but also the bird's flight direction and ground speed, and it is unclear which is best for determining the amount of wind support (the length of the wind vector in a bird’s flight direction) and the influence of cross-winds (the length of the wind vector perpendicular to a bird’s direction) throughout a bird's journey.ResultsWe compared relationships between cross-wind, wind support and bird movements, using path annotation derived from two different global weather reanalysis datasets and three different measures of direction and speed calculation for 288 individuals of nine bird species. Wind was a strong predictor of bird ground speed, explaining 10-66% of the variance, depending on species. Models using data from different weather sources gave qualitatively similar results; however, determining flight direction and speed from successive locations, even at short (15 min intervals), was inferior to using instantaneous GPS-based measures of speed and direction. Use of successive location data significantly underestimated the birds' ground and airspeed, and also resulted in mistaken associations between cross-winds, wind support, and their interactive effects, in relation to the birds' onward flight.ConclusionsWind has strong effects on bird flight, and combining GPS technology with path annotation of weather variables allows us to quantify these effects for understanding flight behaviour. The potentially strong influence of scaling effects must be considered and implemented in developing sampling regimes and data analysis.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2051-3933-1-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Silver eel downstream migration in fragmented rivers: use of a Bayesian model to track movements triggering and duration★

“…Satellite tags (Safi et al, 2013), satellite based monitoring systems (Vermard et al, 2010;Bez et al, 2011;Joo et al, 2013), and acoustic tags with positioning algorithms (Berge et al, 2012) now provide finescale temporal and spatial position data relating to fish, mammals, birds, boats, etc. Different tools have been developed to analyse such trajectory data.…”

Behavioral attributes of turbine entrainment risk for adult resident fish revealed by acoustic telemetry and state-space modeling

“…It is possible that bull trout moving in such an environment respond to fine spatiotemporal changes in flow properties (for example, velocity, turbulence, flow direction) that are not detected by relating behavior to total operational discharge. Indeed, the spatiotemporal variability in the characteristics of water and air flow helps to explain the trajectory of animals moving in fluids, though most work done to date has been focused on migrating animals [10,47,48].…”

On Measures for Groups of Trajectories

“…Derived from location Related works (LaPoint et al 2013;Safi et al 2013;Ranacher and Tzavella 2014) Also direction can be described more finely than with just a global direction, and as with speed, we can use subintervals of I to describe it. These subintervals may be obtained by equal durations or by segmentation.…”