Proceeding of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2462456.2464445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FM-based indoor localization via automatic fingerprint DB construction and matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of navigation, 10 different reference traces were generated by randomly selected users who held their phones 4 The resolution of vertical distance changes depends on the threshold value ptr. In our current implementation, we empirically set ptr = 0.3. in front of their bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the performance of navigation, 10 different reference traces were generated by randomly selected users who held their phones 4 The resolution of vertical distance changes depends on the threshold value ptr. In our current implementation, we empirically set ptr = 0.3. in front of their bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a gap |pn − pm|, indicating a level change, is greater than the threshold ptr, we conduct a forward search afterwards to determine the altitude-changing period. 4 The algorithm outputs a value r l that indicates whether the altitude increases/decrease (r l = −1/1) or not (r l = 0). Particularly, if less than 5 steps are taken by the user during the level-change period, we record an elevator up/down.…”
Section: Level-change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indoor localization has attracted a growing research attention and various techniques have been proposed, including Wi-Fi [14,33,34], Bluetooth [35], radiofrequency identification (RFID) [7,36], FM radio [37], acoustic signals [38], magnetic field [39], UWB [40], and light [41]. Among these signals, the use of Wi-Fi signal has attracted continuous attention due to the pervasive deployment of WLANs and Wi-Fi enabled mobile devices.…”
Section: Indoor Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive study is presented on design and hardware selection of robots [14,15]. Different researchers have come up with different localization technologies for indoor environment; WiFi [16], ultrasonic [17,18], RFID tags [19][20][21], FM [22], magnetic field [23,24], IMU [25], cameras, lasers and sonar [26,27]. Most of these technologies and solutions have some disadvantages and limitations especially when they are used in the indoor environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%