2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fMRI correlates of cortical specialization and generalization for letter processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
56
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
10
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interindividual differences in the estimates of the diffusion-model parameters were then linked to differences in brain activation as observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during performance of these tasks. In line with the assumptions of the diffusion model and its theoretical application to neuroscience (Heekeren, Marrett, & Ungerleider, 2008), we hypothesized that the drift rate, indicating perceptual evidence accumulation, should be associated with activation in stimuli-specific brain regions, that is, in regions involved in processing of numbers and letters ( Joseph, Cerullo, Farley, Steinmetz, & Mier, 2006;James, James, Jobard, Wong, & Gauthier, 2005;Dehaene, Piazza, Pinel, & Cohen, 2003;Eger, Sterzer, Russ, Giraud, & Kleinschmidt, 2003;Joseph, Gathers, & Piper, 2003), such as the left inferior parietal lobe. This prediction is, for example, supported by studies on monkeys that have modeled neurophysiological data from intracranial recordings as diffusion processes (Ratcliff, Hasegawa, Hasegawa, Smith, & Segraves, 2007;Ratcliff, Cherian, & Segraves, 2003;Kim & Shadlen, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interindividual differences in the estimates of the diffusion-model parameters were then linked to differences in brain activation as observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during performance of these tasks. In line with the assumptions of the diffusion model and its theoretical application to neuroscience (Heekeren, Marrett, & Ungerleider, 2008), we hypothesized that the drift rate, indicating perceptual evidence accumulation, should be associated with activation in stimuli-specific brain regions, that is, in regions involved in processing of numbers and letters ( Joseph, Cerullo, Farley, Steinmetz, & Mier, 2006;James, James, Jobard, Wong, & Gauthier, 2005;Dehaene, Piazza, Pinel, & Cohen, 2003;Eger, Sterzer, Russ, Giraud, & Kleinschmidt, 2003;Joseph, Gathers, & Piper, 2003), such as the left inferior parietal lobe. This prediction is, for example, supported by studies on monkeys that have modeled neurophysiological data from intracranial recordings as diffusion processes (Ratcliff, Hasegawa, Hasegawa, Smith, & Segraves, 2007;Ratcliff, Cherian, & Segraves, 2003;Kim & Shadlen, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The angular gyrus (AG) is thought to be essential for grapheme-to-phoneme transformations (Horwitz, Rumsey & Donohue, 1998;Joseph, Cerullo, Farley, Steinmetz & Mier, 2006) and is therefore a likely candidate for symbolic number processing. Indeed, Price and Ansari (2011) found that simply viewing and attending to Arabic numerals elicited activation in the left angular gyrus (AG).…”
Section: Number Processing In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, fMRI appears to be a promising modality for the evaluation of language function, especially in terms of preoperative planning in order to preserve essential language areas. Various paradigms have been developed for preoperative language mapping in fMRI [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]12,15,16,18,20,21) . However, a systemic study of the efficacy of those paradigms has not been performed 1,2) .…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that Broca's area is activated by paradigms such as naming or word generation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]12,15,16,18,20,21,25,27) . Word generation with the use of fixation as a control is a commonly used paradigm due to its simplicity and ease of task [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]12,15,16,18,20,21,25,27) . The authors quantitatively analyzed the individual data in order to determine which combination would be better for visualization of expressive language areas and showed that the word generation paradigm is an effective paradigm for functionally outlining the frontal language area if fixation is used as a contrast.…”
Section: The Value Of Finding a Paradigm That Can Localize Expressivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation