2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fMRI of fearful facial affect recognition in panic disorder: The cingulate gyrus–amygdala connection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
82
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, exaggerated amygdala responsivity to emotional facial expressions has been documented in PTSD (13,14,16) and social phobia (20,23) but not in simple phobia (43) or GAD (present study). More complex fMRI response patterns have been observed in other studies, perhaps owing to differences in the acuteness of the disorder (PTSD) (44), stimulus presentation parameters (i.e., masked vs. unmasked, PTSD) (16,44), and medication status (panic disorder) (45). The relatively small number of subjects assessed in this initial study calls for caution in the interpretation of the present between-group null effect, since such an effect could be due to insufficient statistical power, though we note that the comparison studies referenced above (some showing positive between-group effects) comprised subject samples of similar size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…To date, exaggerated amygdala responsivity to emotional facial expressions has been documented in PTSD (13,14,16) and social phobia (20,23) but not in simple phobia (43) or GAD (present study). More complex fMRI response patterns have been observed in other studies, perhaps owing to differences in the acuteness of the disorder (PTSD) (44), stimulus presentation parameters (i.e., masked vs. unmasked, PTSD) (16,44), and medication status (panic disorder) (45). The relatively small number of subjects assessed in this initial study calls for caution in the interpretation of the present between-group null effect, since such an effect could be due to insufficient statistical power, though we note that the comparison studies referenced above (some showing positive between-group effects) comprised subject samples of similar size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This result is in line with previous studies reporting anterior cingulate cortex volume reduction in patients with panic disorder 71,72 and diminished cingulate activity in patients with panic disorder during identification of fearful facial affect compared to healthy controls. 73 Decreased cingulate cortex activity has been hypothesized to be due to a chronic hyperarousal in patients with panic disorder, 74 because decreased cingulate cortex activity appears to be associated with engagement of arousal networks particularly during processing of threat-related stimuli also in other anxiety disorders such as simple phobias and posttraumatic stress disorder. [75][76][77][78] Given that NPS has been found to dose-dependently elicit increased arousal response as detailed above, the NPSR rs324981 T allele increasing NPSR expression and NPS efficacy at NPSR might confer a heightened risk of panic disorder through an elevated level of arousal as reflected by decreased cingulate cortex activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing of emotionally relevant stimuli occurs in prefrontal cortex, OFC, and amygdala/striatal regions, and has been found to be aberrant in patients with major depression and anxiety disorder (Keedwell et al, 2005;Tremblay et al, 2005;Forbes et al, 2007;Pillay et al, 2006). Comparing AN individuals to psychiatric controls with mood and anxiety findings, as well as normal controls, will eventually be important in determining whether aberrant feeding behaviors are related to more general anxiety and mood phenomena.…”
Section: Limitations/future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%