2000
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FMRI Visualization of Brain Activity during a Monetary Incentive Delay Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

59
1,114
7
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,265 publications
(1,212 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
59
1,114
7
8
Order By: Relevance
“…As S− cues are not rewarded, the signal obtained for those responses cannot be driven by the reward itself, making a reward expectation account a plausible alternative. Our findings are consistent with several human neuroimaging studies showing an activation of the NAc during the anticipatory phase of a monetary incentive delay task (Ernst et al, 2004;Kirsch et al, 2003;Knutson et al, 2000). A straightforward acceptance of the reward anticipation account is somewhat challenged by the lack of significant increase in NAc O 2 signal following incorrect lever choice to the S+.…”
Section: Nucleus Accumbens Activation and Reward Anticipationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As S− cues are not rewarded, the signal obtained for those responses cannot be driven by the reward itself, making a reward expectation account a plausible alternative. Our findings are consistent with several human neuroimaging studies showing an activation of the NAc during the anticipatory phase of a monetary incentive delay task (Ernst et al, 2004;Kirsch et al, 2003;Knutson et al, 2000). A straightforward acceptance of the reward anticipation account is somewhat challenged by the lack of significant increase in NAc O 2 signal following incorrect lever choice to the S+.…”
Section: Nucleus Accumbens Activation and Reward Anticipationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The implication of the OFC/IFG in subjective sensitivity to gradients in monetary value is consistent with a previously suggested role for the OFC in the processing of relative reward in the healthy state (Breiter et al, 2001;Elliott et al, 2003;Kringelbach et al, 2003;Knutson et al, 2000;O'Doherty et al, 2001). Given the additional role of the OFC in emotional suppression (Beauregard et al, 2001;Levesque et al, 2003), and the uniqueness of this brain-behavior correlation to the cocaine abusers only, findings further suggest the impact on results of competing, extraneous or idiosyncratic factors (Montague and Berns, 2002).…”
Section: The Ofc/ifg In the Constrained Subjective Sensitivity To Relsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, OFC neurons discriminate between different rewards based on the relative preferences exhibited in overt behavior (Tremblay and Schultz, 1999). In analogous human functional neuroimaging studies in healthy subjects, the OFC responds maximally to extremes of a reward range (including best outcome versus worse outcome) (Elliott et al, 2003;O'Doherty et al, 2001), demonstrating an association with the reinforcer's relative magnitude (Knutson et al, 2000;Breiter et al, 2001) or its subjective pleasantness (Kringelbach et al, 2003). In drug addiction, we separately reported lack of a graded (i.e., relative) OFC response to monetary reward in cocaine abusers as compared to matched healthy control subjects (Goldstein et al, in press), providing experimental evidence for the central role of OFC dysfunction in reward processing and inhibitory control (i.e., Impaired Response Inhibition and Salience Attribution, I-RISA) in this disorder (Goldstein and Volkow, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorsal striatal (caudate and putamen) activity is regularly reported in human imaging studies of both rewards and punishments (Delgado et al, 2000(Delgado et al, , 2003Elliott et al, 2004;Knutson et al, 2000Knutson et al, , 2001O'Doherty et al, 2002O'Doherty et al, , 2004Pagnoni et al, 2002), thus striatal activity in the current task may relate to feelings of self-punishment. For instance, in one of our scenarios we focused on being rejected for a job.…”
Section: Role Of Striatal Activity In Self-criticismmentioning
confidence: 98%