2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foam evaluation and Kronheimer–Mrowka theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This connection was made the most transparent by the work of Robert and Wagner [RW20], who wrote down a combinatorial formula for GL(N ) closed foam evaluation that allows to build GL(N ) link homology from the ground up, bypassing categorical approaches to the latter. A variation of their formula was used to evaluate unoriented SL(3) foams [KR21], giving a combinatorial approach to some of the structures discovered by Kronheimer and Mrowka [KM19b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This connection was made the most transparent by the work of Robert and Wagner [RW20], who wrote down a combinatorial formula for GL(N ) closed foam evaluation that allows to build GL(N ) link homology from the ground up, bypassing categorical approaches to the latter. A variation of their formula was used to evaluate unoriented SL(3) foams [KR21], giving a combinatorial approach to some of the structures discovered by Kronheimer and Mrowka [KM19b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our construction complements earlier work [QR18,QW21] on the subject. The same approach allows to define state spaces for unoriented SL(3) annular webs, extending the construction in [KR21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations