2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal beam analysis for 3D acquisition geometries in complex media with GPU implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the studies on the horizontal resolution of acquisition geometries [28], [32], we incorporate classic resolution criteria into the multifrequency focal-beam method with an attempt to measure both the horizontal and vertical resolutions of acquisition geometries for seismic imaging in complex media. Unlike the aforementioned conventional wavefield extrapolation from sources (forward) and receivers (backward) to subsurface targets, we modify the focal beaming of wavefields by a more efficient way, that is, we mainly concern the upward continuation of wavefields from a deep target to the surface, significantly reducing the computational cost of high-density and wide-aperture seismic acquisitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the studies on the horizontal resolution of acquisition geometries [28], [32], we incorporate classic resolution criteria into the multifrequency focal-beam method with an attempt to measure both the horizontal and vertical resolutions of acquisition geometries for seismic imaging in complex media. Unlike the aforementioned conventional wavefield extrapolation from sources (forward) and receivers (backward) to subsurface targets, we modify the focal beaming of wavefields by a more efficient way, that is, we mainly concern the upward continuation of wavefields from a deep target to the surface, significantly reducing the computational cost of high-density and wide-aperture seismic acquisitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both types of methods face the challenges of a large parameter space and the nonlinearity of the design problem. Research has shown that global optimization algorithms are effective for solving nonlinear problems; however, the computational costs remain high [18]. Linearized optimization algorithms are fast.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%