2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal epileptiform spikes do not show a canonical BOLD response in patients with benign rolandic epilepsy (BECTS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
73
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…4 In a previous study using EEG-fMRI, Mastertion and colleague illustrated BOLD responses related to interictal epileptic discharges in the rolandic regions. 60 Therefore, our findings combining structural and functional analysis might delineate the alterations in motor networks related to the epileptic activity in patients with BECT. In addition, the decreased functional connections between the left PCL and regions in the DMN also might reflect abnormalities associated with epileptic activity because the DMN, which linked to the fundamental level of brain function during the resting state, showed remarkable deactivation in response to epileptic spikes and abnormal functional connectivity in patients with epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 In a previous study using EEG-fMRI, Mastertion and colleague illustrated BOLD responses related to interictal epileptic discharges in the rolandic regions. 60 Therefore, our findings combining structural and functional analysis might delineate the alterations in motor networks related to the epileptic activity in patients with BECT. In addition, the decreased functional connections between the left PCL and regions in the DMN also might reflect abnormalities associated with epileptic activity because the DMN, which linked to the fundamental level of brain function during the resting state, showed remarkable deactivation in response to epileptic spikes and abnormal functional connectivity in patients with epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2007; Masterton et al, 2010;Moeller et al, 2008a,b;van Houdt et al, 2010;Zijlmans et al, 2007) and testing different artifact modeling strategies Liston et al, 2006b;Salek-Haddadi et al, 2006;van Houdt et al, 2010). Comparable efforts were undertaken at the EEG level, also paying special attention to artifacts (Huiskamp, 2005;Siniatchkin et al, 2007a), or the accurate detection and classification of IED Flanagan et al, 2009;Jann et al, 2008;Liston et al, 2006a;Marques et al, 2009;SalekHaddadi et al, 2006;Vulliemoz et al, 2010b;Zijlmans et al, 2007), vigilance effects and ongoing spontaneous 'background' EEG (Moehring et al, 2008;Siniatchkin et al, 2007b;Tyvaert et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Eeg-fmri Applications In Epilepsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IED-related multifocal positive and negative haemodynamic changes have been commonly revealed both distant and local to the presumed epileptic focus Salek-Haddadi, Diehl et al 2006). These findings have raised questions about the behaviour of the networks associated with epileptiform discharges, and in particular how haemodynamic responses are coupled to these events (Logothetis 2008) as the neurovascular coupling could be altered in pathological states such as epilepsy (Hamandi, Laufs et al 2008;Lemieux, Laufs et al 2008;Grouiller, Vercueil et al 2010;Masterton, Harvey et al 2010). Moreover, scalp EEG-fMRI fails to reveal convincing haemodynamic changes in a significant proportion of cases, possibly due to the limited sensitivity of scalp EEG and consequent poor characterisation of the baseline and inefficient modelling of the fMRI signal (Al-Asmi, Benar et al 2003;Salek-Haddadi, Diehl et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%