1988
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.2.300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal spared areas in fatty liver caused by regional decreased portal flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Focal fat sparing in diffuse fatty liver is reported and well described in the literature (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). It is speculated that fat sparing may occur due to altered fatty acid and triglyceride levels associated with different compositions of hormones in the portal flow and third inflow (2).…”
Section: Fat Sparingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Focal fat sparing in diffuse fatty liver is reported and well described in the literature (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). It is speculated that fat sparing may occur due to altered fatty acid and triglyceride levels associated with different compositions of hormones in the portal flow and third inflow (2).…”
Section: Fat Sparingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An appraisal of liver function based on volume could be considered questionable both before the posterior edge of segment IV in the porta hepatitis. [33][34][35] poietin) rapidly increases in plasma before DNA synthesis and liver regen- …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focal fatty liver change (FFLC) is a pathological condition that has been recognized with increasing frequency, with the widespread use of US [8]. The cause of FFLC has not been clarified, although some authors have speculated that the regional disturbance of intrahepatic portal blood flow may be an important factor [3,7]. Hepatic US in humans with FFLC demonstrates the presence of focal hyperechogenicity in a relatively non-echogenic organ [9,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human medicine, some authors [3,7] have proposed that regional differences in blood flow might be an important factor in explaining the focal nature of the process, but it is also possible that these differences are a result, rather than a cause, of fat depositions. In the present case, the lesion did not appear to be ischemic, because the supplying vessels detected at necropsy were similar in size to those in normal parts, and there was no evidence of venous outlet obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%