Adult age (24 years to 91 years) was examined as a potential moderator of the relations among cognitive abilities in an aggregate dataset based on studies conducted at the Cognitive Aging Lab at the University of Virginia (N = 2,227). A novel approach was applied by which the manifestations of latent ability factors were free to differ across age groups, and age trends in the interrelations among the factors were tested. Contrary to the dedifferentiation hypothesis, there was no evidence for systematic increases in the magnitudes of relations among cognitive abilities. Conventional analytic procedures replicated these findings.
Keywordsaging; dedifferentiation; cognitive abilities; intelligence; measurement invariance Spearman (1904) was the first to establish that all cognitive variables are positively related to one another. He was also among the first to propose moderators of the magnitudes of these relations (Spearman, 1927). In particular, Spearman (1927) hypothesized that ability level modifies the magnitude of ability covariation such that ability interrelations are weaker at higher ability levels. He reasoned that at lower ability levels, a scarcity of domain-general resources constrains performance across a wide range of behaviors, whereas at higher ability levels, domain-general resources are profuse, and behavior is instead limited by the quality of domain-specific structures. Garrett (1938Garrett ( , 1946) applied Spearman's hypothesis to childhood development by arguing that "abstract or symbol intelligence changes in its organization as age increases from a fairly unified and general ability to a loosely organized group of abilities or factors" (Garrett, 1946, p. 373). He termed this conjecture the differentiation hypothesis. Balinsky (1941) similarly examined Spearman's hypothesis in both development and aging, and on the basis of his crosssectional analyses of the Wechsler-Bellevue standardization sample, Balinsky observed that "less of the variance can be accounted for by a single factor through the age group 25 to 29, while more and more of the variance can be so accounted for as the higher age groups are reached" (p. 227). Balinsky concluded that "there is a greater specialization up to a certain point, followed by a later reintegration of the various abilities into a flexible whole" (p. 227). Hence, the hypothesis that abilities become more highly related with adult age has come to be termed reintegration or dedifferentiation (see also Baltes, Cornelius, Spiro, Nesselroade, & Willis, 1980 McHugh and Owens (1954) supported the dedifferentiation hypothesis in a 31-year longitudinal sample of adults (the mean age at their first testing was 19 years). Lienert and Crott (1964) found cross-sectional support for differentiation followed by dedifferentiation in samples of children, adolescents, and adults. They proposed that, because cognitive abilities decline with adult age, their age-based dedifferentiation could be explained by Spearman's (1927) hypothesis that abilities are more closely...