Disaster and Emergency Management Methods 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780367823948-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focus Group Research in Disaster and Emergency Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, no matter which of the proposed future research endeavors are chosen, investigators should attempt to use additional research designs beyond surveys, such as interviews or focus groups, to explore how and why the relationships we observe statistically are occurring (Phillips, 2021; Witkowski et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, no matter which of the proposed future research endeavors are chosen, investigators should attempt to use additional research designs beyond surveys, such as interviews or focus groups, to explore how and why the relationships we observe statistically are occurring (Phillips, 2021; Witkowski et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, no matter which of the proposed future research endeavors are chosen, investigators should attempt to use additional research designs beyond surveys, such as interviews or focus groups, to explore how and why the relationships we observe statistically are occurring (Phillips, 2021;Witkowski et al, 2021). Along these lines, qualitative designs would not only potentially provide us with information regarding how and why certain variables are affecting people's preparedness self-efficacy, but the utility in using these designs lies in the ability to ask this population to make policy or program recommendations that can directly contribute to the enhancement of their preparedness self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Dillman (2011) approach, two reminder emails were sent, which resulted in a response rate of 35% (n = 24). To compliment the online survey, a follow-up focus group was facilitated, which was thematically coded, and is common in research involving emergency management personnel (Knox 2023;Rivera 2019a;Witkowski, Remington, and Ganapati 2021). The intention of this focus group was to clarify and better understand responses observed in the survey instrument, in addition to develop an understandings of respondents' collective perspectives, as a means of contributing to theory building (Jarrett 1993;Morgan 2012;Ryan et al 2014).…”
Section: Planners' Notions Of Accountability Legitimacy and Bureaucra...mentioning
confidence: 99%