Doing Development Research 2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781849208925.n16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focus Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A discussion guide was used to moderate the FGD [63]. FGD highlighted the differences between participants [64].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discussion guide was used to moderate the FGD [63]. FGD highlighted the differences between participants [64].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We interpreted that results generated from the SPSS attaching meaning to specifi c numerical outputs. Further, we transcribed the interviews and FGDs (Lloyd-Evans, 2006) with the help of fi eld notes and recordings. Then, we employed a sequential process of coding, categorizing, and thematising (Creswell, 2012) to analyze the qualitative data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus groups are used to gather information on public perceptions and viewpoints (Lloyd-Evans, 2006). The main strength of this data collection method was described by Morgan (1997) by stating that two eight-person focus groups would generate as many ideas as 10 individual interviews, but the conduction of the data collection process (2 sessions instead of 10), transcription and analysis are clearly more efficient and less time consuming.…”
Section: Identigying Operational Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is particularly difficult to keep the balance between concepts provided by the group and individual ideas within it (Barbour & Kitzinger, 1999). The analysis involves comparing discussion of similar themes and examining how these relate to the variation between groups (Barbour & Kitzinger, 1999;Lloyd-Evans, 2006) and between individuals (Barbour & Kitzinger, 1999). Moreover, sometimes respondents may change their positions later in the discussion which transforms the analysis of focus group in quasi "detective work" (Krueger, 1998).…”
Section: Analysing and Presenting Focus Group Datamentioning
confidence: 99%