2007
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00462.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focus Groups: A Practical and Applied Research Approach for Counselors

Abstract: Focus groups are becoming a popular research approach that counselors can use as an efficient, practical, and applied method of gathering information to better serve clients. In this article, the authors describe focus groups and their potential usefulness to professional counselors and researchers. Practical implications related to the use of focus groups in counseling practice are discussed, and case examples are provided demonstrating how focus groups can be useful to counselors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, among the many possible qualitative techniques the method of focus group was chosen as this particular technique is efficient and practical (Kress & Shoffner, 2007). Meanwhile, focus groups are a particularly useful tool for engaging culturally and linguistically diverse populations (Halcomb, Gholizadeh, Digiacomo, Phillips & Davidson, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, among the many possible qualitative techniques the method of focus group was chosen as this particular technique is efficient and practical (Kress & Shoffner, 2007). Meanwhile, focus groups are a particularly useful tool for engaging culturally and linguistically diverse populations (Halcomb, Gholizadeh, Digiacomo, Phillips & Davidson, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Themes were developed from the data by noting the responses; similar units of meaning were then grouped or categorized [23]. A preliminary summary was shared with the participants by e-mail as they had left the university by the time of analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full transcript was read for a second time and a table was created. Themes were developed from the data by noting the responses, and similar units of meaning were then grouped or categorized [23]. These themes were compared with the literature.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were assigned a pseudonym that was used in completion of an online AUDIT, in the interview process, and for data analysis. Kress and Shoffner (2007) promoted focus groups for exploratory research, especially when the social construction of meaning making is important to the phenomenon being studied. Focus groups, conducted separately for HR and LR drinkers, allowed the college women's discussions of GI to be observed firsthand during the interviews and for themes to organically emerge related to collective perceptions of college women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%