Focus Within or On Others: The Impact of Reviewers’ Attentional Focus on Review Helpfulness

Abstract

When reviewers write online reviews, they differ in the focus of their attention: some focus on their own experiences, whereas some direct their attention to others—prospective consumers who may read the reviews in the future. This paper explores how, why, and when reviewers’ attentional focus can influence the helpfulness evaluation of reviews beyond the impact of substantive review content. Drawing on the attentional focus and persuasion literatures, we develop a theoretical model proposing that reviewers’ attentional focus may influence consumers’ perception of review helpfulness through opposing processes, and that its overall effect is contingent on the review’s two-sidedness. Results of one archival analysis and five controlled experiments provide consistent support for our hypotheses. This work challenges the predominant view of the positive impact of other-focus (vs. self-focus), explores the interpersonal impact of a reviewer’s attentional focus on prospective consumers who are total strangers, and reveals an important, context-specific boundary condition.

The need for a female perspective in designing agent-based negotiation support

“…The findings are in harmony with earlier psycholinguistic literature [27,28,42,45], as they revealed that cognitive processes, such as perspective-taking, are conveyed in language through linguistic patterns. These results also give direction to further research on Strategic Empathy evaluation metrics, and contribute to the scarce body of research on automated evaluation of empathy and Strategic Empathy [1,35].…”

How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community

“…For example, Liu and Jansen (2018) investigated questions and answers posted on Chinese Twitter and found that entertainment, society, and computer‐related questions received fewer responses than the other types. In addition to content, the way a message is conveyed is also important (Lei et al, 2021). Thus, the way in which a question is posed may also influence members' responses to the question.…”

“I Love It” Versus “I Recommend It”: The Impact of Implicit and Explicit Endorsement Styles on Electronic Word-of-Mouth Persuasiveness

“…The persuasion knowledge model suggests that consumers develop and use persuasion knowledge to cope with persuasion attempts by firms and their agents (e.g., marketers and salespeople) (Friestad & Wright, 1994). Consumers’ persuasion knowledge implies their understanding of the source’s attempt to convince them of the necessity or importance of purchasing certain products (Ham et al, 2015; Lei et al, 2021). The fundamental idea of the persuasion knowledge model is that consumers use persuasion knowledge to identify an agent’s hidden persuasion intentions, such as sales intention (Campbell & Kirmani, 2000), to resist the agent’s persuasion efforts (Fitzsimons & Lehmann, 2004) and to develop negative attitudes toward the persuasion message (Tutaj & van Reijmersdal, 2012).…”