2013
DOI: 10.4172/2329-6755.s10-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focusing Controlled Sensitivity of Geophysical Data

Abstract: Different geophysical surveys have a specific sensitivity to geological targets, determined by the physical nature of the observed geophysical field, the design of the data acquisition system, and the configuration and type of the source of the recorded data. The sensitivity is usually limited to some part of the examined geological formation, located relatively close to the sensors. This paper introduces a concept of controlled sensitivity, which enables the sensitivity of a geophysical data to be increased w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical surveys are formed by data acquisition systems measuring different physical fields and signals, e.g., seismic, electromagnetic, gravity, and/or magnetic [8]. The horizons of common interest and the faults were marked by using the Kingdom software for the different seismic lines.…”
Section: Interpretation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical surveys are formed by data acquisition systems measuring different physical fields and signals, e.g., seismic, electromagnetic, gravity, and/or magnetic [8]. The horizons of common interest and the faults were marked by using the Kingdom software for the different seismic lines.…”
Section: Interpretation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to achieving this goal has been introduced in Yoon and Zhdanov (2011) and Zhdanov (2013), where the authors increased the sensitivity of the EM response to the target using the concept of focusing controlled sensitivity by selecting the appropriate combination of the data weights. In papers by Zhdanov (2014, 2015), the authors introduced a concept of optimal SA by determining the optimal parameters of the SA for the MCSEM data, which enhances the EM anomaly from a target located in either deep or shallow marine environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensor measurements incisively probe magnetic source distributions [3,5]: the gradient tensor at a single point in space determines the bearing, normalized sourcestrength, and orientation of a dipole [4]. Tensor gradient magnetometers have to date been macroscopic devices -employing SQUID [6][7][8] or fluxgate [9,10] sensorsprimarily applicable to geophysics and ordinance detection [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%