2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FoldX as Protein Engineering Tool: Better Than Random Based Approaches?

Abstract: Improving protein stability is an important goal for basic research as well as for clinical and industrial applications but no commonly accepted and widely used strategy for efficient engineering is known. Beside random approaches like error prone PCR or physical techniques to stabilize proteins, e.g. by immobilization, in silico approaches are gaining more attention to apply target-oriented mutagenesis. In this review different algorithms for the prediction of beneficial mutation sites to enhance protein stab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
147
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(202 reference statements)
5
147
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified a slightly negative binding Δ Δ G (average Δ Δ G =-0.37 kcal/mol) due to the combination of A184D (OPTN) and R37Q (LC3B) and a destabilization (average Δ Δ G =1.41 kcal/mol) induced by D16N(FUNDC1) and R70C (LC3B), respectively. In parallel, we estimate the changes in binding free energies also with another protocol based on Rosetta (Barlow et al, 2018) for a reciprocal control of the calculation results, as recently suggested for similar applications (Buß et al, 2018). The calculation suggests that only D16N(FUNDC1)-R70C(LC3B) has a destabilizing effect on binding affinity, whereas A184D(OPTN)-R37Q(LC3B) has neutral effects according to Rosetta scan.…”
Section: Local Effects Of the Mutations On Binding Of Lir Motifs And mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We identified a slightly negative binding Δ Δ G (average Δ Δ G =-0.37 kcal/mol) due to the combination of A184D (OPTN) and R37Q (LC3B) and a destabilization (average Δ Δ G =1.41 kcal/mol) induced by D16N(FUNDC1) and R70C (LC3B), respectively. In parallel, we estimate the changes in binding free energies also with another protocol based on Rosetta (Barlow et al, 2018) for a reciprocal control of the calculation results, as recently suggested for similar applications (Buß et al, 2018). The calculation suggests that only D16N(FUNDC1)-R70C(LC3B) has a destabilizing effect on binding affinity, whereas A184D(OPTN)-R37Q(LC3B) has neutral effects according to Rosetta scan.…”
Section: Local Effects Of the Mutations On Binding Of Lir Motifs And mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, 39 missense mutations in FUS occur in patients with the neurodegenerative diseases 40 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration 8 . For instance, 41 a single ALS-associated mutation, G156E, facilitates a liquid-to-solid phase transition of 42 FUS into irreversible aggregates 16 . The importance of FUS in the life of cells, together 43 with the sensitivity of FUS assemblies to point mutations, raises the possibility that natural 44 selection must actively maintain the ability of FUS to form the liquid-droplet state.…”
Section: Body: 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination, these factors contribute to PyRosetta being more strongly correlated with the experimental data, as evidenced by its 0.44 coefficient of determination relative to MD+FoldX's 0.071 coefficient. Indeed, PyRosetta's correlation coefficient of 0.67 for β-lactamase is among the highest PyRosetta correlation coefficients for proteins published in the literature [69,70]. To complement our regression analysis, we additionally computed Spearman's rank correlation coefficients [71] for our Experiment vs. MD+FoldX and Experiment vs. PyRosetta data sets.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Single Mutant Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%