2016
DOI: 10.3390/en9050361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foliage and Grass as Fuel Pellets–Small Scale Combustion of Washed and Mechanically Leached Biomass

Abstract: Abstract:The high contents of disadvantageous elements contained in non-woody biomass are known to cause problems during small and large scale combustion, typically resulting in a higher risk of slagging, corrosion, and increased emissions. Mechanically leaching the respective elements from the biomass through a sequence of process steps has proven to be a promising solution. The florafuel process used here is comprised of size reduction followed by washing and subsequent mechanical dewatering of the biomass. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, Khalsa at al. [20] reported 2S/Cl ratios >10 for urban grass and leaf litter after a leaching process.…”
Section: Combustion Related Properties Of Silage and Press Cakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, Khalsa at al. [20] reported 2S/Cl ratios >10 for urban grass and leaf litter after a leaching process.…”
Section: Combustion Related Properties Of Silage and Press Cakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though combustion of leaf litter may be an efficient conversion process, ash concentration is a known problem, whether it is natural or caused by contamination due to collection, transport or storage. While leaf litter collected in urban parks showed average ash concentration of 13.8% dry matter (DM) [4] and 17.5% DM [5], values can be as high as 34.8% DM when collected from street and pavement surfaces in practice [6]. Removal of ash after combustion is costly and the various ash fractions (bottom ash, cyclone fly-ash and filter fly ash constituting 60%-90%, 10%-35% and 2%-10%, respectively, according to Van Loo and Koppejan [7]) need to be deposited or processed because of their content of hazardous elements (e.g., heavy metals, organic contaminants).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HHVs found by Richter et al [31] were a bit lower, with 17.8 MJ·kg −1 DM for silages and 18.4 MJ·kg −1 DM for PC. While these values were calculated using the chemical composition of biomass, Khalsa et al [32] conducted measurements in a bomb calorimeter with leached biomass comparable to the IFBB PC described here. They found LHV values of 18.4, 18.9 and 18.2 MJ·kg −1 DM for leached grass, foliage and a 50%:50% mixture, which is only marginally higher than the calculated LHVs for L0, L25, L50, L75 and L100 (17.8, 17.9, 18.0, 18.0, and 18.0 MJ·kg −1 DM, respectively).…”
Section: Heating Valuementioning
confidence: 99%