1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(96)00024-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foliar-applied methanol effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) gas exchange and growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous reports that higher than 3% (v/v) methanol is toxic to these cells, possibly due to high osmotic pressure [12,29,30] and fatty acids have been isolated from outside of dead cells [28,30,31]. Furthermore, even at optimal methanol concentrations, the cells may need a period of time to adapt to this carbon source, as cell growth was relatively slow initially and then increased after 10 days.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with previous reports that higher than 3% (v/v) methanol is toxic to these cells, possibly due to high osmotic pressure [12,29,30] and fatty acids have been isolated from outside of dead cells [28,30,31]. Furthermore, even at optimal methanol concentrations, the cells may need a period of time to adapt to this carbon source, as cell growth was relatively slow initially and then increased after 10 days.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, methanol did not affect lipid production as much as it affected biomass, as shown in Fig. 2 [30].…”
Section: Consumption Of Both Co 2 and Methanol Under Mixotrophic Condmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Some reported an increase of photosynthesis (Faver and Gerik 1996) and growth (Madhaiyan et al 2006;Ramirez et al 2006), as well as no effect on growth (Rajala et al 1998). One experiment that used gaseous methanol, at a high concentration (1% in air), focused on the effect on the photosynthetic apparatus and found an inhibition of its biochemical reactions (Loreto et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Under these circumstances, level of methanol did not produce a positive effect on plant height (Table 1). Numerous studies have shown that the height of a plant is reduced by shortage of usable water (Faver and Gerik, 1996). In this research, reduced plant height was also recorded under drought conditions compared with no-drought stress conditions (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%